2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-015-0729-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of mechanical failure associated with reoperation in spinal fusion to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Inoue et al [10], our data suggest that PJK is not generally linked to sacral extension except in patients with an UIV of T9-T12.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to Inoue et al [10], our data suggest that PJK is not generally linked to sacral extension except in patients with an UIV of T9-T12.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Though, our results contradict previously findings, it should be noted that others including Bridwell et al [8] focused on the PJK angle in adult scoliosis patients, rather than SE as a potential risk factor for PJK. Inoue et al [10] showed increased PJK rates in patients with fusion down to the sacrum after ASD realigning surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanical failures, including but not limited to PJK, PJF, DJK, and implant breakage, after spine deformity surgery occur in 12% to 47% of postoperative patients. [11][12][13] Given the high rates of mechanical failures, there has been a conscientious effort to limit such postoperative complications by screening and optimizing patients preoperatively, utilizing newly designed instrumentation, and developing new radiographic parameters to predict postoperative failures. 2,4,12 The recently developed GAP score is an example of a proposed way to predict postoperative mechanical complications using new radiographic parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score is a recently developed score assessing sagittal balance and predicting mechanical complications. 10,11 The GAP score is a pelvic incidence based proportional method of analyzing the sagittal alignment that assigns a cumulative score obtained from the patient's age and 4 different radiographic parameters. The GAP score is divided into 3 categories: proportioned (total score 0-2), moderately disproportioned (total score 3-6), and severely disproportioned (total score 7 and more), which reliably predicted increasing mechanical failure rates for groups with higher scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%