2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.01.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Medical Events in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Information Notice 2013–2016 issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 2013 emphasized the need for verification of treatment parameters prior to HDR treatment 1 . Incorrect manual entry into the treatment planning system (TPS) of the treatment distance was found to be a major source of HDR treatment errors reported to the NRC and International Atomic Energy Agency between 1980 and 2001 2 . More recent analysis of HDR treatment errors reported to the NRC between 1999 and 2015 found that ~63% were due to either mislabeling of catheters or the specification of the wrong treatment length in the TPS, resulting in treatment targets being missed by 0.4–30 cm 2–4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Information Notice 2013–2016 issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 2013 emphasized the need for verification of treatment parameters prior to HDR treatment 1 . Incorrect manual entry into the treatment planning system (TPS) of the treatment distance was found to be a major source of HDR treatment errors reported to the NRC and International Atomic Energy Agency between 1980 and 2001 2 . More recent analysis of HDR treatment errors reported to the NRC between 1999 and 2015 found that ~63% were due to either mislabeling of catheters or the specification of the wrong treatment length in the TPS, resulting in treatment targets being missed by 0.4–30 cm 2–4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 More recent analysis of HDR treatment errors reported to the NRC between 1999 and 2015 found that~63% were due to either mislabeling of catheters or the specification of the wrong treatment length in the TPS, resulting in treatment targets being missed by 0.4-30 cm. [2][3][4] Surface applicators are customized to the shape and size of the lesion. Custom-made applicators have variability in treatment length of catheters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%