2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-018-1981-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of microbial communities in heavy metals-contaminated soils using the metagenomic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
24
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
6
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were consistent with previous studies conducted in urban ecosystems, indicating that the dominant phyla of bacterial communities in urban soils may be similar (Ramirez et al, 2014;Wang, Wu & Kumari, 2018;Xu et al, 2014;Zhalnina et al, 2015). Moreover, it has been reported that the bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and Actinobacteriota were also predominant in agricultural soils, forest soils, and even in heavy metal polluted soils (Hemmat-Jou et al, 2018;Sul et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2017). Thus, the similar relative abundances of these bacterial phyla in urban and suburban park soils may be due to the fact that these phyla can well adapt to various environments.…”
Section: Differences In Microbial Community Composition and Ecologicasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results were consistent with previous studies conducted in urban ecosystems, indicating that the dominant phyla of bacterial communities in urban soils may be similar (Ramirez et al, 2014;Wang, Wu & Kumari, 2018;Xu et al, 2014;Zhalnina et al, 2015). Moreover, it has been reported that the bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and Actinobacteriota were also predominant in agricultural soils, forest soils, and even in heavy metal polluted soils (Hemmat-Jou et al, 2018;Sul et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2017). Thus, the similar relative abundances of these bacterial phyla in urban and suburban park soils may be due to the fact that these phyla can well adapt to various environments.…”
Section: Differences In Microbial Community Composition and Ecologicasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As seen, Proteobacteria (42.8–79.5%), Acidobacteria (1.8–16.5%), Firmicutes (0.9–41.9%), and Chloroflexi (1.0–10.6%) were dominant phyla with high relative abundances in all of the soil sample, which was consistent with the results shown in LEfSe analysis. These predominant phyla also obtained in other metal(loid)s contaminated soil, such as paddy soil, mining sites, and sediment [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], which indicated these phyla might be closely related to metal(loid)s-contaminated soil. For example, Liu et al also found that Proteobacteria (33.0–96.7%), Actinobacteria (0.3–6.9%), Firmicutes (0.0–5.8%), and Chloroflexi (0.0–13.1%) dominated the indigenous soil microbial communities at a chromium salt factory [ 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Interestingly, the decrease of richness and diversity indexes observed in soil between successive cultivation years is less marked in the case of inoculated plants, suggesting that mycorrhizal symbiosis is likely to improve the resilience of the plant and its associated microbial communities against biotic and abiotic stresses (Bi et al, 2018). In previous studies, the mycorrhizal symbiosis was also highlighted to result in changes in the host plant metabolism and hence in the root exudation profile, further modifying and shaping the bacterial communities, in both TE-contaminated and uncontaminated conditions (Harrison, 1999;Hause and Fester, 2005;Ferrol et al, 2016;Iffis et al, 2017). In addition, the exudation of carbohydrates and citric acid, detected in AMF hyphal exudates, and their quantitative and qualitative patterns were brought forward as potential key drivers in the changes of the soil bacterial communities as well (Lioussanne et al, 2010;Iffis et al, 2016;Qin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Mitigated Effects Of Amf Inoculation In Shaping Bacterial Comentioning
confidence: 98%