2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of microbiota structure in cooked ham as influenced by chemical composition and processing treatments: Identification of spoilage bacteria and elucidation on contamination route

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrated that both chemical and biological preservation strategies were more effective in reducing the growth of spoilage microorganisms (mesophilic and LAB counts) in pork hams (F1 and F2) compared to chicken and turkey hams, despite the lack of significant differences in shelf life extension. Previous experiments found that the sorts of spoilage microorganisms and initial LAB counts in control treatments did not differ significantly between the three pork references (Blanco-Lizarazo et al, 2022) and turkey ham (Figure 5). Scientific reports suggest that the higher susceptibility of turkey hams to spoilage may be attributed to their higher moisture content and lower protein, fat, and sodium content compared to pork hams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study demonstrated that both chemical and biological preservation strategies were more effective in reducing the growth of spoilage microorganisms (mesophilic and LAB counts) in pork hams (F1 and F2) compared to chicken and turkey hams, despite the lack of significant differences in shelf life extension. Previous experiments found that the sorts of spoilage microorganisms and initial LAB counts in control treatments did not differ significantly between the three pork references (Blanco-Lizarazo et al, 2022) and turkey ham (Figure 5). Scientific reports suggest that the higher susceptibility of turkey hams to spoilage may be attributed to their higher moisture content and lower protein, fat, and sodium content compared to pork hams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The determination of shelf life followed the protocols described by Blanco‐Lizarazo et al (2022). Each treatment involved evaluating 45‐unit samples (225 g of ham) from three different industrial batches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that Leuconostoc spp. is the most important genus in spoiled cooked ham [5]. The proportion and composition of the microbiota vary depending on processing, storage, and batch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%