2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of mineral grades for geometallurgy: Combined element-to-mineral conversion and quantitative X-ray diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In latest research Parian et al (2015) showed close correspondence to quantitative X-ray powder diffraction results and to bulk chemical data that were treated by element to mineral conversion techniques. The accuracy of SEMbased image analysis is related to the number of particles as well as mineral grains exposed and measured in the polished surface of the studied grain mount (Petruk, 2000) and proper sample preparation to ensure isotropy of the sample (Heinig et al, 2015;Kwitko-Ribeiro, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In latest research Parian et al (2015) showed close correspondence to quantitative X-ray powder diffraction results and to bulk chemical data that were treated by element to mineral conversion techniques. The accuracy of SEMbased image analysis is related to the number of particles as well as mineral grains exposed and measured in the polished surface of the studied grain mount (Petruk, 2000) and proper sample preparation to ensure isotropy of the sample (Heinig et al, 2015;Kwitko-Ribeiro, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…XRD is a cheap and fast data acquisition technique, which has detection limits for minerals quantities lower than 0.5-1.0 wt % [21] depending on the specific mineral and matrix. SEM quantification has a detection limit for minerals of around 0.01 wt % [22,23], but it is more expensive and time consuming than XRD. The mineralogical quantification assessed by each technique is influenced by their respective shortcomings, i.e., sample preparation is a key aspect to consider in both XRD [24,25] and SEM [26,27].…”
Section: Quantification Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of XRD method exist in its complex and time‐consuming sample preparation procedure, taxing calibration curves fitting, and quantification methods selection, as well as its inherent deficiency that it detects crystalline phases only. In addition, automated mineralogy based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical image analysis (OIA) are commonly utilized for estimating mineral grades . The method requires careful and tedious samples preparation and costs time and money …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, automated mineralogy based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical image analysis (OIA) are commonly utilized for estimating mineral grades. [31] The method requires careful and tedious samples preparation and costs time and money. [32] Furthermore, instruments based on element analysis are used to characterize clay related properties in oil sands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation