Analysis of moderation practices in a large STEM-focused faculty

Czaplinski, Iwona; Senadji, Bouchra; Adie, Lenore; Beutel, Denise

doi:10.1109/tale.2014.7062561

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2016

2025

Publication Types

Select...

Other1

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The rubric presents a set of guidelines to students and markers outlining the requirements and expectations of the assessment piece. Developing appropriate marking rubric is a challenge itself [18]. If a marking rubric is too prescriptive it reduces misinterpretation but discourages students' creativity and freedom.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Objective analysis of marker bias in higher education

Chakraborty

Zhou

Hafeez‐Baig

et al. 2016

2016 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Marker bias has been a serious factor contributing to discrepancy in assessments. In this study we analyze one year students' results in a Business Faculty within an Australian university to understand the extent of variation induced by marker bias in multiple marker scenarios. The study shows interesting insights regarding the marking trends of a particular marker, and shows variations among markers in a particular course. The study paves the way for quantification of marker variation through objective analysis.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%