2019
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1688414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of multi-frequency and multi-polarization SAR data for wetland mapping in Hamoun-e-Hirmand wetland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most appropriate SAR frequency to characterize wetlands varies according to the physiognomy of the existing vegetation. In accordance with previous studies (Mahdianpari, Salehi, Mohammadimanesh, and Motagh 2017;Maleki et al 2020;, our results indicate that model accuracy is higher in the X-band frequency than in the C-band frequency for herbaceous vegetations, especially when only one date is available. However, the findings show that C-band is slightly more relevant than X-band to discriminate woody vegetations and ponds.…”
Section: Is the Influence Of Frequency Polarization And Number Of Acquisition Dates On Model Accuracy Regardless Of Vegetation Type?supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most appropriate SAR frequency to characterize wetlands varies according to the physiognomy of the existing vegetation. In accordance with previous studies (Mahdianpari, Salehi, Mohammadimanesh, and Motagh 2017;Maleki et al 2020;, our results indicate that model accuracy is higher in the X-band frequency than in the C-band frequency for herbaceous vegetations, especially when only one date is available. However, the findings show that C-band is slightly more relevant than X-band to discriminate woody vegetations and ponds.…”
Section: Is the Influence Of Frequency Polarization And Number Of Acquisition Dates On Model Accuracy Regardless Of Vegetation Type?supporting
confidence: 92%
“…band frequency, polarization mode, number of acquisition dates) on discrimination of wetland vegetation has been studied extensively in recent years (Mahdavi, Salehi Sr, et al 2017;Wohlfart et al 2018). Regarding band frequency, the advantage of the X-band over the C-band (Maleki et al 2020;S-band (van Beijma, Comber, andLamb 2014) for discriminating wetland vegetation types has been described, as has the advantage of the Lband over the C-band for mapping emergent (Simioni et al 2019) or woody (Amani et al 2019;Mahdianpari, Salehi, Mohammadimanesh, and Motagh 2017) vegetations. The literature also describes the advantage of quad-polarized data over dual-polarized data to discriminate woody (de Almeida Furtado, Silva, and de Moraes Novo 2016; Mahdianpari, Salehi, Mohammadimanesh, and Motagh 2017) (de Almeida Furtado et al, 2016, Mahdianpari et al, 2017a or boreal (Mahdianpari, Salehi, and Mohammadimanesh 2017) wet-land vegetation types.…”
Section: Lemna Minormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and polarizations. There are many different characteristics associated with each of these frequencies and polarizations that make them more suitable and informative for a specific application [210], [211]. • Due to the higher wavelength of the microwave signals, SAR can penetrate into shallow water, snow, ground [212], [213].…”
Section: • Sar Images Can Be Acquired In Different Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully utilizing characteristics of wetlands in SAR images is the key to accurately classify and effectively monitor wetlands. Firstly, the backscattering intensity can describe the response difference between targets on radar pulse [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Secondly, textures can supplement the SAR information dimension, but those ones used in SAR wetland classification were calculated by Gray-level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) commonly [18,19], which seldom considers the statistical distribution characteristics of SAR data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%