1996
DOI: 10.1109/78.553544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of multidimensional DSP specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the synchronous data flow graph model is introduced [Lee and Messerschmitt 1987] for individual or 1D signals. To model the dependencies between multidimensional arrays of signals, we use the stream model of Phideo [Verhaegh et al 2001] and the single assignment multidimensional signal representations [Verbauwhede et al 1996].…”
Section: Specification and Models Of Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the synchronous data flow graph model is introduced [Lee and Messerschmitt 1987] for individual or 1D signals. To model the dependencies between multidimensional arrays of signals, we use the stream model of Phideo [Verhaegh et al 2001] and the single assignment multidimensional signal representations [Verbauwhede et al 1996].…”
Section: Specification and Models Of Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we discuss two approaches to derive the data dependencies for the accesses in arrays, i.e. static analysis and symbolic execution [VSR96]. Static analysis relies on an underlying geometric model, such that transformations for the NLP can be computed, but requires affine expressions.…”
Section: Data Dependency Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbolic execution has no problem handling nonaffine expressions, but requires a manifest access pattern before data dependencies can be derived. Therefore, approaches applying symbolic execution can have difficulties with non-manifest behavior [VSR96].…”
Section: Data Dependency Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%