1985
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(85)90032-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of multiple event related potential components in a tone discrimination task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that mental training may have also affected processes reflected by the P200. The P200 is typically associated with the beginning of an executive process responsible for stimulus identification and the initiation of decision making, and is also modulated by attention (Lindholm and Koriath, 1985). In line with previous studies, a smaller P200 (averaged between 150–300ms) was observed to attended vs. unattended deviant tones (paired t-test for all participants attended vs. unattended deviant tones averaged across time 1 and time2, p<0.000001, t(1,30)>6.4 above Fz and Cz).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that mental training may have also affected processes reflected by the P200. The P200 is typically associated with the beginning of an executive process responsible for stimulus identification and the initiation of decision making, and is also modulated by attention (Lindholm and Koriath, 1985). In line with previous studies, a smaller P200 (averaged between 150–300ms) was observed to attended vs. unattended deviant tones (paired t-test for all participants attended vs. unattended deviant tones averaged across time 1 and time2, p<0.000001, t(1,30)>6.4 above Fz and Cz).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect was also highly similar both in time course and scalp topography to the P200 (Figure 3). This ERP component is typically associated with the beginning of executive processes responsible for stimulus identification and the initiation of decision-making and is also modulated by attention (Lindholm and Koriath, 1985). This point is important if one assumes that monitoring of distractors is one important mechanism for regulating task-unrelated thoughts processes during task performance (Lutz et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects need to be clarified by further investigation. The P2 component is believed to be functionally connected with an automatic stimulus identification and classification (Lindholm and Koriath, 1985). The P2 alterations may reflect an early orienting or preparatory problem which affects later processing stages in the stop-signal task (Brandeis et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For statistical analysis, three distinct time windows during which subject-level ERP peaks (point with greatest absolute maxima within a time window) were selected: 1) 100–150 ms is believed to represent early sensory components (Herrmann and Knight, 2001), 2) a middle latency transitional peak (150–250 ms) post stimulus corresponds to response selection (Heslenfeld et al, 1997; Kenemans et al, 1993; Lindholm and Koriath, 1985) and 3) a later temporal window (300–575 ms) post stimulus is considered to represent response action and visual feedback processes (Fallgater et al, 2001). Behaviorally, response inhibition is measured as a false alarm rate for non-target stimuli; its neurophysiological correlate is assessed by quantifying brain electrical field frontalization during correctly identified non-target stimuli (Fallgater et al, 1997; Young et al, 2017).…”
Section: Adaptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%