2018
DOI: 10.1002/em.22210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of mutation in the rat Pig‐a assay: II. Studies with bone marrow granulocytes

Abstract: The in vivo erythrocyte Pig-a gene mutation assay measures the phenotypic loss of GPI-anchored surface markers. Molecular analysis of the marker-deficient erythrocytes cannot provide direct proof that the mutant phenotype is due to mutation in the Pig-a gene because mammalian erythrocytes lack genomic DNA. Granulocytes are nucleated cells that originate from myeloid progenitor cells in bone marrow as is the case for erythrocytes, and thus analysis of Pig-a mutation in bone marrow granulocytes can provide infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). The spectrum of ENU‐induced Pig‐a mutations in bone marrow granulocytes from the same rats was remarkably similar, although the mutations occurred not necessarily at the same positions within the Pig‐a gene [for details see the companion manuscript by Dad et al, ]. Such a spectrum is consistent with the mutagenic properties of ENU determined in other in vivo models that detect mutation in the X‐linked Hprt and Pig‐a reporter genes by conventional Sanger‐sequencing of expanded mutant clones [Jansen et al, ; Casciano et al, ; Miura et al, ; Revollo et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…). The spectrum of ENU‐induced Pig‐a mutations in bone marrow granulocytes from the same rats was remarkably similar, although the mutations occurred not necessarily at the same positions within the Pig‐a gene [for details see the companion manuscript by Dad et al, ]. Such a spectrum is consistent with the mutagenic properties of ENU determined in other in vivo models that detect mutation in the X‐linked Hprt and Pig‐a reporter genes by conventional Sanger‐sequencing of expanded mutant clones [Jansen et al, ; Casciano et al, ; Miura et al, ; Revollo et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…As an example, anti‐rat erythroid OX‐83 antibody may have altered the performance of the anti‐CD59 antibody in the rat BME Pig‐a assay, but Kimoto et al, described a mouse BME Pig‐a assay in which anti‐mouse erythroid Ter‐119 antibody was successfully used for positive identification of erythroid nucleated cells [Kimoto et al, ]. Another example of antibody interference was noted in our laboratory during the development of a rat bone marrow granulocyte Pig‐a assay [Dad et al, ], when inclusion of an antibody (produced by clone HIS48) for labeling a secondary lineage‐specific granulocyte marker interfered with the performance of an antibody against the GPI‐anchored CD48 marker (prevented the detection of potential CD48‐deficient mutants; see the accompanying manuscript on bone marrow granulocyte Pig‐a assay). Unless, of course, the epitope for HIS48 antibody happens to be GPI‐anchored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analyses of mutations were performed using the previously described protocol, Mutation Analysis with Multiplexed Libraries, MAML (Revollo et al ., 2017a; 2018; 2019; Dad et al ., 2018). Briefly, from 300 to 1,500 cells were sorted in bulk into a tube filled with 50 μl of DNAzol® Direct (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%