2015
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of mutation of the c-Kit gene and PDGFRA in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to investigate mutation status of the and in patients with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In total, 93 patients with a GIST were included in the study, in which polymerase chain reaction amplification and gene sequencing were used to detect the sequences of exons 9, 11, 13 and 17 in and exons 12 and 18 in. mutations were detected in 64 cases (68.82%), of which exon 11 mutations were detected in 56 cases (60.22%), exon 13 mutations were detected in three cases (3.23%) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have been found by Heinrich et al [27] and Debiec-Rychter et al [28]. Patients with KIT exon 17 mutations can rarely be detected in GISTs, and their response to imatinib is variable; in most cases, they respond well to imatinib therapy [29][30][31]. In addition, approximately 10% of GIST patients have no mutation in either KIT or PDGFRA, and these tumors are called wild-type GISTs and have an approximately 0% to 45% likelihood of a response to imatinib [8,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar findings have been found by Heinrich et al [27] and Debiec-Rychter et al [28]. Patients with KIT exon 17 mutations can rarely be detected in GISTs, and their response to imatinib is variable; in most cases, they respond well to imatinib therapy [29][30][31]. In addition, approximately 10% of GIST patients have no mutation in either KIT or PDGFRA, and these tumors are called wild-type GISTs and have an approximately 0% to 45% likelihood of a response to imatinib [8,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar findings have been found by Heinrich MC et al[27] and Debiec-Rychter M et al[28]. Patients with KIT exon 17 mutations can rarely be detected in GISTs, and their response to imatinib is variable; in most cases, they respond well to imatinib therapy[29][30][31]. In addition, approximately 10% of GIST patients have no mutation in either KIT or PDGFRA, and these tumors are called wild-type GISTs and have an approximately 0-45% likelihood of a response to imatinib[8,23].…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is a molecule with also a tyrosine kinase activity. The pathway that follows the activation of the receptor is basically similar to that of c-KIT [23,25]. The most frequent genetic alterations in c-KIT and PDGFRA including missense mutations as well as insertions and deletions are summarized in Tables 1, 2, respectively.…”
Section: Mutational "Hot Spots" In C-kit and Pdgframentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since PDGFRA and c-KIT genes share a high amino acid sequence homology, the functional consequences of their alterations are similar. Indeed, in both cases the mutations can generate autophosphorylation, which triggers the activation of two main signaling pathways, the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK and the PI3K-AKT-mTOR cascades, which leads to uncontrolled cell growth [25].…”
Section: Mutational "Hot Spots" In C-kit and Pdgframentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation