1982
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(82)90051-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of neutron β-decay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
267
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
267
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our current study we have focussed on the role of second-class current contributions, most notably on the impact of a non-zero g 2 coupling, on the ability to identify physics BSM. In the course of developing our analysis procedure, we have discovered that certain recoil effects to the neutron lifetime, contrary to the usual view [51], can have an impact on our fit results. Moreover, the precise form of the recoil corrections depends on experimental details, revealing that the corrections change with a finite experimental acceptance, such as in experiments which extract a value of the lifetime from measurements of the decay electrons and/or protons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In our current study we have focussed on the role of second-class current contributions, most notably on the impact of a non-zero g 2 coupling, on the ability to identify physics BSM. In the course of developing our analysis procedure, we have discovered that certain recoil effects to the neutron lifetime, contrary to the usual view [51], can have an impact on our fit results. Moreover, the precise form of the recoil corrections depends on experimental details, revealing that the corrections change with a finite experimental acceptance, such as in experiments which extract a value of the lifetime from measurements of the decay electrons and/or protons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…ÅAEÇ f 1Y6886 ì ×ÂÍÕÑÓ ×ÂÊÑÄÑÅÑ ÒÓÑÔÕÓÂÐÔÕÄÂ; d H R 1Y466  10 À2 ì ÏÑAEÇÎßÐÑ ÐÇÊÂÄËÔËÏÂâ ÄÐÇÛÐââ ÓÂAEËÂÙËÑÐÐÂâ ÒÑÒÓÂÄÍÂ, ÍÑÕÑÓÂâ ÄÞÚËÔÎâÇÕÔâ Ô ÕÑÚ-ÐÑÔÕßá 9  10 À5 [2,3]; D R 2Y40  10 À2 ì ÏÑAEÇÎßÐÑ ÊÂÄËÔËÏÂâ ÄÐÖÕÓÇÐÐââ ÓÂAEËÂÙËÑÐÐÂâ ÒÑÒÓÂÄÍÂ, ÍÑÕÑÓÂâ ÄÞÚËÔÎâÇÕÔâ Ô ÕÑÚÐÑÔÕßá 8  10 À4 [4,5]; l ì ÑÕÐÑÛÇÐËÇ ÂÍÔËÂÎßÐÑ-ÄÇÍÕÑÓÐÑÌ Ë ÄÇÍÕÑÓÐÑÌ ÍÑÐÔÕÂÐÕ ÔÎÂÃÑÅÑ ÄÊÂËÏÑAEÇÌÔÕÄËâ, l G A aG V ; G F ì ×ÇÓÏËÇÄÔÍÂâ ÍÑÐ-ÔÕÂÐÕ ÔÎÂÃÑÅÑ ÄÊÂËÏÑAEÇÌÔÕÄËâ, ÑÒÓÇAEÇÎâÇÏÂâ ËÊ m-ÓÂÔÒÂAEÂ; K " h2p 3 ln 2" hc 6 am e c 2 5 . ³ÄÑAEÐÂâ ×ÑÓÏÖΠAEÎâ ÄÞÚËÔÎÇÐËâ jV ud j 2 ËÊ ÐÇÌÕÓÑÐ-ÐÑÅÑ b-ÓÂÔÒÂAE ËÏÇÇÕ ÄËAE [1,3] jV ud j 2 4908 AE 4 s t n 1 3l 2 Y 1X3…”
Section: £äçAeçðëçunclassified
“…Though these two expressions capture the essence of how δm np enters into these rates there are a number of corrections that must be taken into account before the n ↔ p reaction rates reach sufficient accuracy [17,18,19] given the accuracy of the data we will eventually use in our constraints.…”
Section: Nuclear Reaction Rates and λQcdmentioning
confidence: 99%