2018
DOI: 10.1134/s1063772918060069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Numerical Algorithms for Computing Rapid Momentum Transfers between the Gas and Dust in Simulations of Circumstellar Disks

Abstract: Approaches used in modern numerical simulations of the dynamics of dust and gas in circumstellar disks are tested. The gas and dust are treated like interpenetrating continuous media that can exchange momentum. A stiff coupling between the gas and dust phases is typical for such disks, with the dust stopping time much less than the characteristic dynamical time scale. This imposes high demands on the methods used to simulate the dust dynamics. A grid, piecewise-parabolic method is used as the basic algorithm f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We studied numerically the global evolution of viscous and selfgravitating circumstellar disks starting from disk formation and ending after about one million years of disk evolution. Such long integration times were made possible thanks to the use of the numerical hydrodynamics code FEOSAD, originally developed by and modified in this work to include the effect of back-reaction of dust on gas according to the method laid out in Stoyanovskaya et al (2018). The turbulent viscosity in the disk is parameterized by a spatially and temporarily constant value of the Shakura-Sunyaev α-parameter, set equal to 0.01, which corresponds to the active MRI through the disk extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied numerically the global evolution of viscous and selfgravitating circumstellar disks starting from disk formation and ending after about one million years of disk evolution. Such long integration times were made possible thanks to the use of the numerical hydrodynamics code FEOSAD, originally developed by and modified in this work to include the effect of back-reaction of dust on gas according to the method laid out in Stoyanovskaya et al (2018). The turbulent viscosity in the disk is parameterized by a spatially and temporarily constant value of the Shakura-Sunyaev α-parameter, set equal to 0.01, which corresponds to the active MRI through the disk extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the subscripts p and p refer to the planar components (r, φ) in polar coordinates; Σ g is the gas surface density; e is the internal energy per surface area; P is the vertically integrated gas pressure calculated via the ideal equation of state as P = (γ − 1)e with γ = 7/5; u p = v rr + v φφ is the gas velocity in the disk plane; and ∇ p =r∂/∂r +φr −1 ∂/∂φ is the gradient along the planar coordinates of the disk. The term f p is the drag force per unit mass between dust and gas, describing the back-reaction of dust on gas according to the method described in Stoyanovskaya et al (2018). The gravitational acceleration in the disk plane, g p = g rr + g φφ , takes into account self-gravity of the gaseous and dusty disk components found by solving the Poisson integral (see details in Vorobyov & Basu 2010) and the gravity of the central protostar when formed.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also require extremely high spatial resolu-tion in order to capture correctly the dephasing between gas and dust, i.e., the dissipation of energy through the drag . Some efficient bifluid treatments were developed to cope with these issues (e.g., semi implicit methods, Lorén-Aguilar & Bate 2014Bate , 2015Stoyanovskaya et al 2017Stoyanovskaya et al , 2018. As an alternative way to model correctly these mixtures, Laibe & Price (2014a) proposed an algorithm for smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic codes (SPH, Lucy 1977;Gingold & Monaghan 1977) using a monofluid formalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%