Analysis of oil shale and petroleum source rock pyrolysis by triple quadrupole mass spectrometry: comparisons of gas evolution at the heating rate of 10.degree.C/min

Reynolds, John G.; Crawford, R.W.; Burnham, Alan K.

doi:10.1021/ef00027a025

Cited by 59 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…3; Table 6). In comparison, Reynolds et al [42] measured water generated at the temperature range from 150 to 600°C for Fushun oil shale, and they attributed the water to pyrite oxidation and clay dehydration. Williams and Chishti [43] determined that 153.4 mg/g of hydrocarbon and 117.4 mg/g of water were generated during pyrolysis of the Kark oil shale, and the proportion of hydrocarbon generated from the Kark shale (56.6%) is similar to that from the Huadian oil shale (48.2%).…”

Section: Huadian Fushun Huadian Fushunmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pyrolysis kinetics of oil shale from northeast China: Implications from thermogravimetric and Rock–Eval experiments

Han

Zhong

Huang

et al. 2015

Fuel

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Huadian Fushun Huadian Fushunmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pyrolysis kinetics of oil shale from northeast China: Implications from thermogravimetric and Rock–Eval experiments

Han

Zhong

Huang

et al. 2015

Fuel

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Mathematical models based on the evolution of hydrocarbon classes (C 1 , C 2 -C 5 C 6 -C 15 , C 15+ ) measured by Rock-Eval pyrolysis do provide more accurate data on hydrocarbon formation but are still based on bulk data and are not compound-specific (Espitalie et al, 1988). Attempts to determine compound-specific kinetic parameters by pyrolysis-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry have generally been limited to light hydrocarbon species (Braun et al, 1992;Reynolds et al, 1991); furthermore, with this technique it is difficult to obtain quantitative data for the individual compounds due to ion-neutral reactions in the ionization chamber (matrix effects).…”

Section: Compositional Modeling Of Hydrocarbon Generation and Destrucmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Advanced Chemistry Basins Project

Goddard¹,

Meulbroek²,

Tang³

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the next decades, oil exploration by majors and independents will increasingly be in remote, inaccessible areas, or in areas where there has been extensive shallow exploration but deeper exploration potential may remain; areas where the collection of data is expensive, difficult, or even impossible, and where the most efficient use of existing data can drive the economics of the target. The ability to read hydrocarbon chemistry in terms of subsurface migration processes by relating it to the evolution of the basin and fluid migration is perhaps the single technological capability that could most improve our ability to explore effectively because it would allow us to use a vast store of existing or easily collected chemical data to determine the major migration pathways in a basin and to determine if there is deep exploration potential. To this end a the DOE funded a joint effort between California Institute of Technology, Cornell University, and GeoGroup Inc. to assemble a representative set of maturity and maturation kinetic models and develop an advanced basin model able to predict the chemistry of hydrocarbons in a basin from this input data. The four year project is now completed and has produced set of public domain maturity indicator and maturation kinetic data set, an oil chemistry and flash calculation tool operable under Excel, and a user friendly, graphically intuitive basin model that uses this data and flash tool, operates on a PC, and simulates hydrocarbon generation and migration and the chemical changes that can occur during migration (such as phase separation and gas washing).The DOE Advanced Chemistry Basin Model includes a number of new methods that represent advances over current technology. The model is built around the concept of handling arbitrarily detailed chemical composition of fluids in a robust finite-element 2-D grid. There are three themes on which the model focuses: chemical kinetic and equilibrium reaction parameters, chemical phase equilibrium, and physical flow through porous media. The chemical kinetic scheme includes thermal indicators including vitrinite, sterane ratios, hopane ratios, and diamonoids; and a user-modifyable reaction network for primary and secondary maturation. Also provided is a database of typespecific kerogen maturation schemes. The phase equilibrium scheme includes modules for primary and secondary migration, multi-phase equilibrium (flash) calculations, and viscosity predictions. Abstract

show abstract

“…However, later nonisothermal and ". ;,othermal experiments have shown that most of the hydrocarbon gas from type I oil shales has the same kinetics as oil, although some of the methane is generated by a slower process (Reynolds et al, 1991). For type II oil shales, most of the hydrocarbon gas still has the same kinetics as oil, but a much larger fraction of the methane is generated by the slower process.…”

Section: Hydrocarbon Generation and Crackingmentioning

confidence: 99%

96/00160 Chemical kinetics and oil shale process design

1996

Fuel and Energy Abstracts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Analysis of oil shale and petroleum source rock pyrolysis by triple quadrupole mass spectrometry: comparisons of gas evolution at the heating rate of 10.degree.C/min

Cited by 59 publications

References 1 publication

Pyrolysis kinetics of oil shale from northeast China: Implications from thermogravimetric and Rock–Eval experiments

Pyrolysis kinetics of oil shale from northeast China: Implications from thermogravimetric and Rock–Eval experiments

The Advanced Chemistry Basins Project

96/00160 Chemical kinetics and oil shale process design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About