“…In the present study, the neonicotinoid fluxes were established separately for the upper and midlower Yangtze River as follows (in units of tons) where L Upstream In , L Tributary In , L Nonpoint In , L Sewage In , L Sediment Release , and L Precipitation are the inputs from upstream, tributaries/lakes, nonpoint sources, sewage discharges, sediment release and precipitation, respectively, and L Downstream Out , L Water Use Out , L Photolysis , and L Evaporation Out are the losses from downstream, water use, photolysis process, and evaporation, respectively. When solving the equation, the following assumptions were made: (a) compared with runoff from agricultural areas into the rivers (nonpoint source), the sewage discharge from industrial production (point source) into the rivers is considered small for neonicotinoids; , (b) because neonicotinoids are a type of hydrophilic substance, it is difficult for them to absorb into sediment, which results in low concentrations in the sediments, ,, and thus, the release of neonicotinoids from sediments is expected to be very low; and (c) the exchange of neonicotinoids between water and air consists of precipitation and evaporation. According to previous studies, the concentration of neonicotinoid in the air was in the range from 1.0 to 4.0 pg/m 3 , , 6–7 orders of magnitude lower than that in the water found in this study.…”