1972
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1972.10469635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Ozone and Nitric Oxide by a Chemiluminescent Method in Laboratory and Atmospheric Studies of Photochemical Smog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By using a 'reversed' mode and supplying the instrument with pure nitric oxide, an extremely sensitive ozone detector was achieved (Stedman et al, 1972). Minimal gas sampling plumbing and faster electronics were used to increase the frequency response of ozone detection and to take advantage of this sensitivity.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a 'reversed' mode and supplying the instrument with pure nitric oxide, an extremely sensitive ozone detector was achieved (Stedman et al, 1972). Minimal gas sampling plumbing and faster electronics were used to increase the frequency response of ozone detection and to take advantage of this sensitivity.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that both methods reveal the presence of oxidants in the atmosphere but only tend to be related quantitatively. These results provide additional data on the problem documented in New York City, 12 but without suggesting any easy solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For eddy correlation, [NO] was measured with a fast-response chemiluminescent analyzer, built at Argonne and described by Drapcho et al (1983), and the signal was recorded at a rate of 20 s -I. This sensor uses the basic concept and operation described by Stedman et al (1972), Ritter et al (1979, MacFarland (1980), andKley et al (1981). The noise level of the instrument was approximately 40 pptv of NO when [NO] was very small, near 0.1 ppbv.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%