2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of parameters that influence the amplitude of the ESR/alanine signal after irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, precise EPR dosimetry protocols correct for the associated signal loss over time. Fading rates may depend on the manufacturing process (Anton 2008) as well as on the pre-and post-irradiation storage conditions (Arber andSharpe 1993, Dolo andFeaugas 2005). Hence, fading measurements need to be performed for each specific type of pellet and the applied storage conditions.…”
Section: Spectral Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, precise EPR dosimetry protocols correct for the associated signal loss over time. Fading rates may depend on the manufacturing process (Anton 2008) as well as on the pre-and post-irradiation storage conditions (Arber andSharpe 1993, Dolo andFeaugas 2005). Hence, fading measurements need to be performed for each specific type of pellet and the applied storage conditions.…”
Section: Spectral Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relative humidity (RH) must be controlled during measurements and storage to maintain it as constant as possible (Arber and Sharpe, 1993;Dolo and Feaugas, 2005). Indeed, pellets take up or release water correspondingly to ambient RH, which has an effect on the measurements namely the ESR intensity and the mass of pellets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor (1) refers to the spectrometer sensitivity, storage and measurements conditions of DLalanine dosimeters. According to previous reports (Dolo and Feaugas, 2005;Ciesielski et al, 2003;Nagy, 2000;Alexandre et al, 1992), the procedure used in storage and the dosimeter reading error adds uncertainties less than 3%, as shown in Table 1. Therefore, larger differences between planned and measured doses cannot be attributed to ESR measurements.…”
Section: In Vivo Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 94%