2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjti/s40485-016-0036-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of passive calorimetric probe measurements at high energy influxes

Abstract: High energy influxes increase the complexity of passive calorimetric probe measurements because of an increasing temperature of the surrounding materials like the probe holder. This leads to a distinctively different evolution of the probe temperature compared to low energy influxes. Different established methods for the analysis of passive calorimetric probe data are presented and it is shown that they are not applicable for high energy influx measurements resulting in the requirement of a novel analysis appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with the plasma jet treatment and as presented with the surface energy measurements, with a scanning speed of 10, 20, and 30 m/min, there are no changes in the dispersive contribution that can be attributed to almost no modification of the surface roughness. At a lower speed of 5 m/min a slight increase of the dispersive contribution can, however, be observed and attributed to the heating effect of the plasma jet characterized by Kewitz et al [ 18 ] Plasma overtreatment of the polymer substrate can then lead to melting of the top surface, sputter, and recrystallization process that can explain here the higher surface roughness as observed using AFM characterization in the plasma treatment of polyamide using OpenAir‐Plasma activation. [ 19 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with the plasma jet treatment and as presented with the surface energy measurements, with a scanning speed of 10, 20, and 30 m/min, there are no changes in the dispersive contribution that can be attributed to almost no modification of the surface roughness. At a lower speed of 5 m/min a slight increase of the dispersive contribution can, however, be observed and attributed to the heating effect of the plasma jet characterized by Kewitz et al [ 18 ] Plasma overtreatment of the polymer substrate can then lead to melting of the top surface, sputter, and recrystallization process that can explain here the higher surface roughness as observed using AFM characterization in the plasma treatment of polyamide using OpenAir‐Plasma activation. [ 19 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The templates are mounted on a microscope slide that is held upside down above the plasma by reduced pressure. For the aerographite templates, an APPJ (Plasmatreat) consisting of a FG5001 generator, a HTR12 transformer, and a RD1004 nozzle was chosen (Figure ) . At the nozzle, a precursor inlet was mounted for introducing hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) into the effluent jet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the aerographite templates, an APPJ (Plasmatreat) [13] consisting of a FG5001 generator, a HTR12 transformer, and a RD1004 nozzle was chosen ( Figure 2). [19,20] At the nozzle, a precursor inlet was mounted for introducing hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) into the effluent jet. The templates were fixed between two stainless steel grids (w = 0.08 mm, d = 0.05 mm) inside an aluminum stencil.…”
Section: Plasma Processing and Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probe design used for the present experiments was adapted to the high energy flux and high gas flow emitted by the plasma jet. The design of the probe is presented in [12] and the data analysis used in this study is the one discussed in [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%