2013
DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.6.276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of periodontal attachment loss in relation to root form abnormalities

Abstract: PurposeThe aim of this study was to explore root shape abnormalities, to investigate the influence of root form abnormalities on periodontal attachment loss, and to gather basic data to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of aggressive periodontitis.MethodsFrom January 2010 to June 2012, a survey was conducted of all 3,284 periodontitis patients who visited the Department of Periodontology, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Dentistry. Clinical parameters (probing depth, periodontal attac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPD, the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the sulcus/pocket (in mm), was measured at six surfaces around each tooth using a constant‐force (20 g) electronic probe (The Florida Probe System, Florida Probe, Gainesville, FL.). CAL, the length from the cemento‐enamel junction to the depth of the pocket base (in mm), is an assessment of the pocket depth and gingival recession (Chung & Jeong, 2013). CAL was measured using a manual periodontal probe on six surfaces of each tooth (Michigan O periodontal probe, Hu‐Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPD, the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the sulcus/pocket (in mm), was measured at six surfaces around each tooth using a constant‐force (20 g) electronic probe (The Florida Probe System, Florida Probe, Gainesville, FL.). CAL, the length from the cemento‐enamel junction to the depth of the pocket base (in mm), is an assessment of the pocket depth and gingival recession (Chung & Jeong, 2013). CAL was measured using a manual periodontal probe on six surfaces of each tooth (Michigan O periodontal probe, Hu‐Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 6 ] Numerous studies have confirmed loss of maxillary molars due to periodontal disease as compared to premolars and incisors. [ 7 8 9 ] Most frequently lost teeth are maxillary molars as compared to mandibular teeth. [ 10 ] Previous studies have shown that at the age of 55–64 years, 18% retained all of their molars and 51% retained their anterior teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%