1996
DOI: 10.3354/meps144285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of phytoplankton of the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean:comparisons of microscopy and size frequency data with interpretations of pigment HPLC data using the 'CHEMTAX' matrix factorisation program

Abstract: A new matrix factorization program 'CHEMTAX was used to ~nterpret high-performance hquid chromatography (HPLC) pigment data from a transect between Prydz Bay Antarct~ca and Australla dunng March 1987 The program calculated the abundance of diatoms dinoflagellates haptophytes resembling Emiliania huxleyl haptophytes resembling P h a e o c j~s t~s antarctlca cyanobacteria prasinophytes, chlorophytes and cryptophytes along the transect The results were compared with those of microscopy and particle size analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
137
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An earlier method by Gieskes et al (1988) used a multiple regression analysis to infer the values of the pigment ratios from the measured dataset. A new program for estimating class abundances from chemical markers, so-called CHEMTAX, was developed by Mackey et al (1996) and applied by Wright et al (1996) and Meyer-Harms et al (1999). But this method was not applicable to our dataset because it requires a previous knowledge of the pigment ratios of the local populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier method by Gieskes et al (1988) used a multiple regression analysis to infer the values of the pigment ratios from the measured dataset. A new program for estimating class abundances from chemical markers, so-called CHEMTAX, was developed by Mackey et al (1996) and applied by Wright et al (1996) and Meyer-Harms et al (1999). But this method was not applicable to our dataset because it requires a previous knowledge of the pigment ratios of the local populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears likely that our single-depth sampling can be considered as representative of upper water column phytoplankton concentrations because pigment samples and profiles of beam attenuation and nighttime fluorescence from some of these voyages as well as previous work show that biomass is generally well mixed in the upper water column and that when subsurface chlorophyll maxima are present they primarily reflect increased chlorophyll levels rather than increased phytoplankton abundances (Bowie et al, 2011a, b;Parslow et al, 2001;Rintoul and Trull, 2001;Shadwick et al, 2015;Trull et al, 2001b;Wright et al, 1996;Wright and van den Enden, 2000). This perspective is also consistent with the limited information on the depth distributions of coccolithophores in the Southern Ocean, which generally exhibit relatively uniform and maximal values (especially for the most abundant species, Emiliania huxleyi) within the surface mixed layer (Findlay and Giraudeau, 2000;Holligan et al, 2010;Mohan et al, 2008;Takahashi and Okada, 2000).…”
Section: Representativeness Of Oceanographic Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHEMTAX program was used to estimate the contribution of different phytoplankton taxa to total Chl a . Taxa known to be present in Antarctic waters (diatoms, haptophytes, dinoflagellates, cryptophytes, prasinophytes, and chlorophytes) were included in the analysis using initial pigment ratios for each taxa determined for Antarctic waters by Wright et al (1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%