2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmret.2006.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of plantar pressure in diabetic type 2 subjects with and without neuropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, mean peak pressure within the former group was 23% higher. Ctercteko et al (1981), Pitei et al (1999) and Rahman et al (2006) reported similarly lower rates of peak pressure increase (8%, 32% and 15%, respectively) in diabetic subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, mean peak pressure within the former group was 23% higher. Ctercteko et al (1981), Pitei et al (1999) and Rahman et al (2006) reported similarly lower rates of peak pressure increase (8%, 32% and 15%, respectively) in diabetic subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Therefore, computer aided diagnostic techniques were developed to utilize this relationship alone for the detection of diabetes. In one such study, pressure distribution techniques were used for analyzing the mechanical behavior of the human foot during static and dynamic loading situations in normal subjects, and subjects with Type 2 diabetes and diabetes with neuropathy [15]. They used static parameters and the power ratio features with neural network classifier for automatic classification, and obtained an accuracy of 90%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damaged motor nerves cannot innervate muscles, and consequently, muscles will atrophy. In the foot, this results in a high arch with progression toward prominent MH and hammering of the toes with both conditions causing increased pressures at the MH and toe regions (Bus, Maas, de Lange, Michels, & Levi, 2005; Rahman et al, 2006; van Schie, 2005). It appears that both groups in this investigation may have been at some risk for developing an ulcer based on possible structural changes of the feet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%