2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of polychrome Iron Age glass vessels from Mediterranean I, II and III groups by LA-ICP-MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sample set relative to 7 th -6 th century BC glass, belonging to the Golasecca culture (Angelini et al 2011), shows a LMG composition, which is natron glass. Other literature data pertain to a later period, as Etruscan natron glass from Spina and Bologna dated to the 6 th -3 rd (Arletti et al 2009(Arletti et al , 2011b and from Adria dated to the 5 th -2 nd century BC (Panighello et al 2012), confirm the standardisation of the natron glass in that period. The very few data for 8 th -6 th century BC Northern Italian glass, do not allow a real comparison with our results.…”
Section: Orientalising/archaic Glass (Last Quarter 8 Th -6 Th Centurysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A sample set relative to 7 th -6 th century BC glass, belonging to the Golasecca culture (Angelini et al 2011), shows a LMG composition, which is natron glass. Other literature data pertain to a later period, as Etruscan natron glass from Spina and Bologna dated to the 6 th -3 rd (Arletti et al 2009(Arletti et al , 2011b and from Adria dated to the 5 th -2 nd century BC (Panighello et al 2012), confirm the standardisation of the natron glass in that period. The very few data for 8 th -6 th century BC Northern Italian glass, do not allow a real comparison with our results.…”
Section: Orientalising/archaic Glass (Last Quarter 8 Th -6 Th Centurysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Different studies on the Mediterranean I, II and III glass groups produced between the sixth and the fourth centuries BCE bear witness to a fairly complex situation. Published results [14][15][16][17] show varying correlations between cobalt, iron, zinc, copper and nickel. These variations suggest either the contemporaneous exploitation of different cobalt-bearing ores or a small-scale exploitation process of a large cobalt mine with different types of cobalt ores, giving rise to a range of colorant compositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transient signals were recorded and evaluated for elemental quantification. Ga, 85 Rb, 88 Sr, 89 Y, 90 Zr, 93 Nb, 118 Sn, 121 Sb, 137 Ba, 139 La, 140 Ce, 141 Pr, 142 Nd, 152 Sm, 153 Eu, 158 Gd, 159 Tb, 164 Dy, 165 Ho, 166 Er, 169 Tm, 174 Yb, 175 Lu, 178 Hf, NIST SRM 610 [17] and Corning D archeological glass [18] were used as the external standard for modern and medieval objects respectively. The results of elemental composition, for all samples, were recalculated to the content of the oxides using SiO 2 as the internal standard.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%