1990
DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)81117-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of pre-mRNA processing in transfected plant protoplasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
146
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RNase A/T1 protection analysis was essentially performed as described in Goodall et al+ (1990)+ The 32 P-labeled antisense probe was transcribed with T7 polymerase from plasmid pTL66 linearized with Eco57 I+ The probe was treated with RQ1-RNase-free DNase (Promega) and gel purified+ Nine micrograms of total RNA were mixed with ;40 cpm of probe in 30 mL of PIPES buffer (40 mM PIPES, pH 6+7, 400 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA)/50% formamide+ Annealing was performed overnight at 48 8C+ Digestion in RNase buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7+5, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) was with 7+5 U of RNase T1/1+5 mg RNase A (both purchased from Boehringer) for 30 min at 25 8C+ Protected products were recovered by phenol-chloroform extraction and separated on an 8% polyacrylamide gel+ A sequencing reaction was used as a ladder+ With the antisense U24 transcript used (212 nt), the protected fragment corresponding to the mature 39 end of U24 was detected at the expected length of 77 nt+ Plasmid pTL66 was constructed as follows: a U24 genomic fragment encompassing the 39 end of U24 was recovered by KpnI/ DraI digestion from plasmid pFH2 (a kind gift of Y+ Henry) and subcloned in pBluescript+…”
Section: Rnase A/t1 Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNase A/T1 protection analysis was essentially performed as described in Goodall et al+ (1990)+ The 32 P-labeled antisense probe was transcribed with T7 polymerase from plasmid pTL66 linearized with Eco57 I+ The probe was treated with RQ1-RNase-free DNase (Promega) and gel purified+ Nine micrograms of total RNA were mixed with ;40 cpm of probe in 30 mL of PIPES buffer (40 mM PIPES, pH 6+7, 400 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA)/50% formamide+ Annealing was performed overnight at 48 8C+ Digestion in RNase buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7+5, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) was with 7+5 U of RNase T1/1+5 mg RNase A (both purchased from Boehringer) for 30 min at 25 8C+ Protected products were recovered by phenol-chloroform extraction and separated on an 8% polyacrylamide gel+ A sequencing reaction was used as a ladder+ With the antisense U24 transcript used (212 nt), the protected fragment corresponding to the mature 39 end of U24 was detected at the expected length of 77 nt+ Plasmid pTL66 was constructed as follows: a U24 genomic fragment encompassing the 39 end of U24 was recovered by KpnI/ DraI digestion from plasmid pFH2 (a kind gift of Y+ Henry) and subcloned in pBluescript+…”
Section: Rnase A/t1 Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNase A/T1 protection analysis was performed essentially as described (Goodall et al 1990). Anti-sense probes were synthesized in the presence of [a-32 P]-CTP using the Maxiscript kit (Ambion) and gel purified; 1-5 mg of total RNA (prepared with TRIzol, Invitrogen) was mixed with probe (50,000 cpm) for hybridization and digestion with 40 mg/mL RNase A (Roche) and 2 mg/mL RNase T1 (Calbiochem).…”
Section: Fluorescence Methods and Immunochemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNase protection was performed as described by Goodall et al (1990). RNA probes were synthesized in vitro with T3 or T7 RNA polymerase, using [a-^^P]CTP (30 Ci/mmole) and linear ized plasmids as templates.…”
Section: Rnase A/t^ Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNAs from HeLa cells, transfected COS cells, and yeast cells were isolated by guanidinium thiocyanate/phenol-chloroform extraction as described by Goodall et al (1990) and Tollervey and Mattaj (1987), respectively. The hot phenol/SDS method (Steele et al 1965) was used for isolation of RNA from subcel lular fractions of HeLa cells, yeast cell extracts, and pellets of immunoprecipitation reactions.…”
Section: Isolation Of Rnamentioning
confidence: 99%