Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Erlang 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1863509.1863517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of preprocessor constructs in Erlang

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis we perform requires knowledge of the Erlang pre-processor, and similar work to this is reported in Kitlei et al (2010).…”
Section: Testing and Refactoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis we perform requires knowledge of the Erlang pre-processor, and similar work to this is reported in Kitlei et al (2010).…”
Section: Testing and Refactoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is an established literature on refactoring test code written in the 'xUnit' style (Meszaros, 2007), we are not aware of xUnit-awareness having been implemented in any existing refactoring engines. The analysis we perform requires knowledge of the Erlang pre-processor, and similar work to this is reported in Kitlei et al (2010).…”
Section: Case Study: Removal Of Error Macrosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically in Erlang, the preprocessor tracks macro definitions, expands macro applications and, of course, performs header file inclusion and conditional compilation. In RefactorErl, files (either modules or headers) loaded into the tool are always preprocessed [22], therefore this is the first point where we are allowed to put some customisation into the process.…”
Section: Preprocessormentioning
confidence: 99%