2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-020-01371-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of prevalence and prognosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD

Abstract: Background For patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as comorbidity have poor outcomes. However, data on the impact of previously diagnosed and new- diagnosed T2DM in such a patient population is lacking. Methods Inpatients diagnosed with AECOPD in the department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine of The First Hospital of China Medical University during 2011–2017 were enrolled. Data on demography, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A national study performed in 129 hospitals throughout the Spanish territory, with more than 5000 patients included, analysed the characteristics of patients admitted for COPD Figueira-Gonçalves et al BMC Research Notes (2022) 15:36 exacerbation and evidenced a prevalence of active smoking, T2DM, and heart disease of 30, 26, and 30%, respectively, clearly below the prevalence detected in our study (37,40, 43%, respectively) [37]. All these factors can impact on the clinical progress of these patients in hospital [6,38,39]. However, conclusions from our sample should be drawn with caution as there may be a survival bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…A national study performed in 129 hospitals throughout the Spanish territory, with more than 5000 patients included, analysed the characteristics of patients admitted for COPD Figueira-Gonçalves et al BMC Research Notes (2022) 15:36 exacerbation and evidenced a prevalence of active smoking, T2DM, and heart disease of 30, 26, and 30%, respectively, clearly below the prevalence detected in our study (37,40, 43%, respectively) [37]. All these factors can impact on the clinical progress of these patients in hospital [6,38,39]. However, conclusions from our sample should be drawn with caution as there may be a survival bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in patients with COPD varies between 14% and 33% [30], and our cohort falls within this range. The prevalence of DM in patients with COPD varies from 9% to 30% depending on ethnicity and experimental design [31][32][33][34]; however, few studies have addressed DM prevalence in aged patients with COPD. We found DM prevalence was 56.4% in this cohort is higher than in previous studies [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of DM in patients with COPD varies from 9% to 30% depending on ethnicity and experimental design [31][32][33][34]; however, few studies have addressed DM prevalence in aged patients with COPD. We found DM prevalence was 56.4% in this cohort is higher than in previous studies [31][32][33][34]. This discrepancy may be due to several factors, including the cohort's older median age (80; IQR: 70-87), increased severity of COPD (65.2% was Group C, and 34.8% was Group D) according to the GOLD classification [3], and requirement for the intensive followed-up due to the regulation of P-4-P program according to the guidance from National Health Insurance Program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the fact that long-term use of invasive ventilator support measures could aggravate pulmonary infection, and lengthen the ventilator's standby time, which in consequence would increase the probability of ventilator dependence and other risks, it is of great concern clinically to make every effort to minimize the time of invasive ventilator support [33]. At present, the sequential invasive-noninvasive respirator-assisted ventilation has already been developed as the primary approach for treating patients with AECOPD complicated with ARF [34,35]. In the past, the time point of conversion between invasive and noninvasive ventilator support measures was mainly decided by the doctors based on their clinical experience, which, however, is still lacks of quantitative parameters to support such a decision due to the differences among individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%