2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of primary endocrine therapy in patients older than 70 years with breast cancer rejecting surgery from a single unit in South Africa including COVID-19 issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis demonstrated that primary endocrine therapy (pET), even as monotherapy, has comparable response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with oestrogen receptor (ER) positive tumours, and with considerably lower toxicity [ 33 ]. Consistently, a retrospective study in South Africa revealed that pET can be a viable alternative for those patients over 70 years of age [ 34 ]. Not having an alternative modified treatment in LMICs is one of the missed opportunities to address those elderly patients who want to optimise all medical treatments except the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A meta-analysis demonstrated that primary endocrine therapy (pET), even as monotherapy, has comparable response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with oestrogen receptor (ER) positive tumours, and with considerably lower toxicity [ 33 ]. Consistently, a retrospective study in South Africa revealed that pET can be a viable alternative for those patients over 70 years of age [ 34 ]. Not having an alternative modified treatment in LMICs is one of the missed opportunities to address those elderly patients who want to optimise all medical treatments except the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“… 55 - 59 Eleven studies (85%) evaluated endocrine medications, one evaluated cytotoxic chemotherapies, 52 and one evaluated combined medications. 58 Two studies exclusively assessed rate, 55 , 57 two evaluated determinants, 56 , 59 and eight assessed both the rate and determinants of adherence. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated adherence-enhancing interventions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the MMAT-Version 2018, three studies were rated as high quality, 47 , 49 , 50 six studies as average quality, 48 , 51 , 53 , 56 , 58 , 59 and the remaining four as low quality 52 , 54 , 55 , 57 (Data Supplement).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations