Proceedings of the 36th International MATADOR Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-432-6_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of process parameters in the micromachining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Figure 5 shows the value for minimum chip thickness obtained therein. The average value was found to be 0.2-0.4 mm, which lies in a range between 20% and 40% of the average tool edge radius (1 mm), as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4 Figure 5 shows the value for minimum chip thickness obtained therein. The average value was found to be 0.2-0.4 mm, which lies in a range between 20% and 40% of the average tool edge radius (1 mm), as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a related research, the same methodology was used to correlate and contrast micro-milling carried out with undeformed chip thickness kept below edge radius, with micromachining keeping undeformed carried out above edge radius. 4 These were also compared with conventional macro-milling. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) results showed that in terms of surface roughness, burr width and tool wear, micro-milling carried out keeping the undeformed chip thickness above the tool edge radius was more analogous to macro-milling than micro-milling with undeformed chip thickness less than the tool edge radius.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the undeformed chip thickness is set less than the tool edge radius, the influence of the feed on tool wear, surface roughness, and burr width was observed to be lower. Jaffery et al [16] also pointed out that tool wear is driven by stochastic factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%