1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02457413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of publication quality in a Cancer Research Institute

Abstract: The paper presents an experimental method for the evaluation of scientific papers in the field of ontology and related disciplines developed at the National Institute for Cancer Research (IST), Genoa, Italy. The method is based on the partitioning of categories of the Science Citation IndexJournal Citation Reports (SCI-JCR) into deciles, thus normalizing Impact Factor (IF), in order to guage the quality of the productivity. A second parameter related to the number of staff of each department co-authoring a giv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the Science Citation Index (SCI) from the Web of Science databases of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) are the most important and frequently used source database of choice for a broad review of scientific accomplishment in all studying fields (Bayer and Folger 1966;Braun et al 2000). Conventional bibliometric methods often evaluate the research trend by the publication outputs of countries, institutes, journals, and research fields (Braun et al 1995;Colman et al 1995;Ugolini et al 1997) or by the citation analysis (Cole 1989). However, merely depending on the change in the citations or publication counts of countries and organizations cannot completely indicate the development trend or future orientation of the research field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the Science Citation Index (SCI) from the Web of Science databases of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) are the most important and frequently used source database of choice for a broad review of scientific accomplishment in all studying fields (Bayer and Folger 1966;Braun et al 2000). Conventional bibliometric methods often evaluate the research trend by the publication outputs of countries, institutes, journals, and research fields (Braun et al 1995;Colman et al 1995;Ugolini et al 1997) or by the citation analysis (Cole 1989). However, merely depending on the change in the citations or publication counts of countries and organizations cannot completely indicate the development trend or future orientation of the research field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citation analysis: Citation analysis was considered an important indicator since the listing of references in publications is traditionally used by researchers to acknowledge the value of previous work. [6] The study used citation analysis to measure the impact of a publication or author by counting the number of times a paper is cited by other authors in their work.…”
Section: H-indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bibliometric methods often evaluate the trend of the research by publication outputs of countries, research institutes, journals, and the research field analysis (Braun et al 1995;Colman et al 1995;Ugolini et al 1997). The analysis of the author keywords, languages and co-authorship pattern are also going to be conducted in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%