Analysis of purified protein derivative test results in patients with active tuberculosis before and after anti-tuberculosis therapy

Yang, Jian-Gong; Huang, Bing; Wang, Jicheng; Yin, Yi‐Chen

doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.12.039

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…in children [ 37 ]), with recent conversion [ 35 , 39 ], with lower levels of immunoreactivity [ 2 , 36 , 40 , 41 , 43 ], normal chest radiography findings [ 39 , 45 , 46 ] and with limited re-exposure [ 2 ]. Consistently, the relatively few prospective studies that have not observed reversion have largely been performed in either high-incidence settings [ 50 ], among strong reactors [ 36 ] or among those with TB retested during or shortly after treatment [ 51 , 52 ]. However, even past disease does not preclude reversion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Overlooked, dismissed, and downplayed: reversion ofMycobacterium tuberculosisimmunoreactivity

Dale,

Schwalb,

Coussens

et al. 2024

Eur Respir Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused byMycobacterium tuberculosis(Mtb). Following infection, immune responses toMtbantigens can be measured using the tuberculin skin test or an interferon-γ release assay. The gain ofMtbimmunoreactivity, a change from a negative to a positive tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay result, is called conversion and has long been used as a measure ofMtbexposure. However, the loss of immunoreactivity (reversion; a positive followed by a negative result) has often been overlooked. Instead, in clinical and epidemiological circles,Mtbimmunoreactivity is commonly considered to persist lifelong and confer a lifetime of disease risk. We present a critical review, describing the evidence for reversion from cohort studies, ecological studies and studies of TB progression risk. We outline the inconsistent reasons why reversion has been dismissed from common understanding and present evidence demonstrating that, just as conversion predominantly indicates prior exposure toMtbantigens, so its opposite, reversion, suggests the reduction or absence of exposure (endogenous or exogenous).Mtbimmunoreactivity is dynamic in both individuals and populations and this is why it is useful for stratifying short-term TB progression risk. The neglect of reversion has shaped TB research and policy at all levels, influencing clinical management and skewingMtbinfection risk estimation and transmission modelling, leading to an underestimation of the contribution of re-exposure to the burden of TB, a serious oversight for an infectious disease. More than a century after it was first demonstrated, it is time to incorporate reversion into our understanding of the natural history of TB.

show abstract