2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4549(02)00042-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of reactivity induced accidents at Pakistan Research Reactor-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculation of pressure drops (entrance, frictional, sudden contraction, sudden expansion, etc.) along the holder in water box showed that for example that a hole of 5 cm diameter size would allow coolant flow rate of 16.3 m 3 /h that would be about 1.7% of total core flow rate [18][19][20] through the core. Coolant velocity in the target fuel channel was calculated to be 4.08 m/s with this hole size (5 cm diameter) and was adopted for the thermal calculations.…”
Section: Thermalhydraulic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of pressure drops (entrance, frictional, sudden contraction, sudden expansion, etc.) along the holder in water box showed that for example that a hole of 5 cm diameter size would allow coolant flow rate of 16.3 m 3 /h that would be about 1.7% of total core flow rate [18][19][20] through the core. Coolant velocity in the target fuel channel was calculated to be 4.08 m/s with this hole size (5 cm diameter) and was adopted for the thermal calculations.…”
Section: Thermalhydraulic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…axial power profile of the core was multiplied by the radial power peaking factor and the engineering hot channel factor 1.584 to account for the various uncertainties (Bokhari et al, 2002). All the calculations were performed with a water inlet temperature of 38 C and inlet pressure of 1.712 bars.…”
Section: Thermal Hydraulic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective coolant flow rate reported for the existing PARR-1 core is 950 m 3 /h, i.e. 95% of the full flow rate (Bokhari et al, 2002). Therefore, to calculate the maximum coolant velocity, we recalculated the coolant velocity in the coolant channels on 950 m 3 /h effective flow rate.…”
Section: Hydraulic Stability Of the Cores For A Constant Coolant Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%