2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of rectangular stiffened plates under uniform lateral load based on FSDT and element-free Galerkin method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyse the entire folded plate, we treat the individual stiffened and un-stiffened flat plates together as superelements, and superpose their stiffness matrices. However, as reported in Reference [24], one difficulty remains. Due to a lack of Kronecker delta properties in the meshfree shape functions, the direct superposition of the stiffness matrices does not give satisfying analytical results.…”
Section: Geometric Non-linear Analysis Of Folded Platesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To analyse the entire folded plate, we treat the individual stiffened and un-stiffened flat plates together as superelements, and superpose their stiffness matrices. However, as reported in Reference [24], one difficulty remains. Due to a lack of Kronecker delta properties in the meshfree shape functions, the direct superposition of the stiffness matrices does not give satisfying analytical results.…”
Section: Geometric Non-linear Analysis Of Folded Platesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The subscript I on the right-hand side of Equations (23) and (24) refers to an imaginary reference line that runs parallel to the x-axis through the I th kernel particle, whereas on the left-hand side it refers to the locations of spline nodes on this line.…”
Section: Displacements Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some indications can be found in specialized literature on the best possible way to choose the location and shape parameters of the activation functions. As an example, Peng et al [8] observe that a larger support size and higher order of RB functions will yield better convergence results. This fact can be partially explained in the light of the stationarity of the total energy of the continuum, as explained in the following paragraph.…”
Section: Meshless Approach For Static Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding the vector field which minimizes (10) and satisfies the EBC (7) and the straindisplacement conditions (8) yields the solution of the elastostatic problem.…”
Section: Meshless Approach For Static Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%