2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2011.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of regulatory framework of electric power market in Honduras: Promising and essential changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the key aspects of the agreement is that the state must carry out the consultation; in Honduras the state has delegated this activity to the project developer, which has led to disagreements or misunderstandings when the community must validate or accept the project. In Honduras, the regulator is often weakened, so the developers tend to impose projects on the communities (Flores, ). The state of Honduras does not have a regulatory framework where the socialization of energy projects is considered exclusively, i.e., regulation that considers the implementation of ILO Convention 169; at present, the government intends to regulate it by decree.…”
Section: Important Aspects Of Honduras’ Energy Sector After the 2009 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key aspects of the agreement is that the state must carry out the consultation; in Honduras the state has delegated this activity to the project developer, which has led to disagreements or misunderstandings when the community must validate or accept the project. In Honduras, the regulator is often weakened, so the developers tend to impose projects on the communities (Flores, ). The state of Honduras does not have a regulatory framework where the socialization of energy projects is considered exclusively, i.e., regulation that considers the implementation of ILO Convention 169; at present, the government intends to regulate it by decree.…”
Section: Important Aspects Of Honduras’ Energy Sector After the 2009 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the level of competition increased overall, in some instances state monopolies were replaced by private monopolies -either by international conglomerates, such as Unión Fenosa in Nicaragua and Guatemala and Distribuidora de Electricidad del Sur in El Salvador, or by national elites (Barnes and Waddle, 2004;Cupples, 2011). In Honduras, the reforms to the sector that were enacted in the 1990s to separate policy, regulation and service, were not fully completed, leaving the utility as a vertically integrated state owned enterprise (Flores, 2012). For Honduras and Nicaragua, privatisation of state-owned electricity utilities was a condition of admission to the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC) (Cupples, 2011).…”
Section: Shifting Energy Governance: From State To Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy mix of the country changed from a primarily hydro‐based one to a thermal‐based one, as favorable financing dropped off and private investors estimated more favorably returns from fossil‐fuel plants with their lower capital costs. According to the World Bank (Flores, ), there were a number of reasons that the new market model did not work, centering on political clientelism and weak institutions. It notes the lack of de facto unbundling, the ineffective separation of government roles between the Secretariat of Natural Resources and Environment (SERNA) and ENEE, and the lack of technical expertise in the government; the National Energy Commission (CNE) was marginalized.…”
Section: Evolution Of State‐driven Central American Electricity Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It notes the lack of de facto unbundling, the ineffective separation of government roles between the Secretariat of Natural Resources and Environment (SERNA) and ENEE, and the lack of technical expertise in the government; the National Energy Commission (CNE) was marginalized. As a result, ENEE became the de facto regulator and operator (Flores, , p. 49). Finally, the new reliance on oil for fuel meant volatile prices, making it more difficult politically to pass on increases to customers.…”
Section: Evolution Of State‐driven Central American Electricity Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation