2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of relative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines using an instrumental variable method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…La rEV frente a hospitalizaciones por cualquier causa se estimó en el 10% (IC 95% 8 a 12%), frente a hospitalizaciones por eventos cardiorrespiratorios en el 18% (IC 95% 15 a 21%) y frente a hospitalizaciones por gripe o neumonía en el 14% (IC 95% 6 a 22%). El beneficio adicional de la vacuna de alta dosis se observó de forma similar en todas las temporadas analizadas [32] (tabla 2). Con este estudio se confirmaba la mayor efectividad de la vacuna de alta dosis previniendo hospitalizaciones por gripe durante 5 temporadas consecutivas, 2010-11 a 2014-15.…”
Section: Efectividad De La Vacuna Anti Gripal Trivalente De Alta Dosisunclassified
“…La rEV frente a hospitalizaciones por cualquier causa se estimó en el 10% (IC 95% 8 a 12%), frente a hospitalizaciones por eventos cardiorrespiratorios en el 18% (IC 95% 15 a 21%) y frente a hospitalizaciones por gripe o neumonía en el 14% (IC 95% 6 a 22%). El beneficio adicional de la vacuna de alta dosis se observó de forma similar en todas las temporadas analizadas [32] (tabla 2). Con este estudio se confirmaba la mayor efectividad de la vacuna de alta dosis previniendo hospitalizaciones por gripe durante 5 temporadas consecutivas, 2010-11 a 2014-15.…”
Section: Efectividad De La Vacuna Anti Gripal Trivalente De Alta Dosisunclassified
“…21 In an analysis of data collected from 1.7 million veterans over 5 influenza seasons, HD-IIV3 was shown to be more effective than IIVs in preventing influenza- or pneumonia-associated hospitalizations (rVE = 14%; 95% CI = 6-22), cardiorespiratory hospitalizations (rVE = 18%; 95% CI = 15-21), and all-cause hospitalization (rVE = 10%; 95% CI = 8-12). 22 Finally, in an analysis of data collected from 2.1 million members of a managed care company over 2 influenza seasons, HD-IIV3 was shown to be more effective than aIIV3 in preventing respiratory-related hospitalizations (rVE = 12%; 95% CI = 3.3-20). 23…”
Section: Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no published studies on the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IIV4 compared with other vaccines in adults aged 65 years and older in real-life, but data can be extrapolated from HD-IIV3. [19][20][21][22][23] In an analysis of data collected from 6.1 million Medicare beneficiaries over 2 influenza seasons, HD-IIV3 was shown to be more effective than IIVs in preventing postinfluenza deaths (rVE = 24.0%; 95% CI = 0.6-42). 19 In an analysis of data collected from a cohort of 73 773 veterans over 1 influenza season, HD-IIV3 was shown to be more effective than IIVs in preventing influenza-or pneumonia-associated hospitalization (rVE = 25%; 95% CI = 2-43) and all-cause outpatient visits (rVE = 5%; 95% CI = 2-8).…”
Section: Effectiveness Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 These findings have been supported by post-marketing studies, which have shown that IIV3-HD provides improved protection against influenza, serious pneumonia, postinfluenza death, and all-cause, influenza-related, and cardiorespiratory-associated hospitalization. [15][16][17][18][19] To further improve protection against influenza in older adults, a quadrivalent formulation of the high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4-HD) is being developed. A recent phase III trial in the US showed that, in healthy adults ≥65 years of age, IIV4-HD was well tolerated and induced immune responses that were non-inferior to responses induced by IIV3-HD for the shared strains and superior responses for the additional B-lineage strain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%