2016
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of repeated 24-core saturation prostate biopsy: Inverse association between asymptomatic histological inflammation and prostate cancer detection

Abstract: Abstract. Saturation prostate biopsy protocols have been developed to improve the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate, particularly in the setting of repeat biopsies. The present study attempted to clarify the association between PCa detection and various risk factors in repeat saturation biopsies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These detection rates might not be simply compared with each other, as the patient backgrounds including the distribution of MRI scores and PSA are different among the biopsy reports in Japan. However, the CDRs of both any cancer and CSCa by MRUS fusion biopsy technique TB might be greater than the conventional biopsy technique in those reported previous studies . In the present study, CDRs of CSCa per patient were 45.8% in SBx versus 70.2% in MRUS TB ( P < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These detection rates might not be simply compared with each other, as the patient backgrounds including the distribution of MRI scores and PSA are different among the biopsy reports in Japan. However, the CDRs of both any cancer and CSCa by MRUS fusion biopsy technique TB might be greater than the conventional biopsy technique in those reported previous studies . In the present study, CDRs of CSCa per patient were 45.8% in SBx versus 70.2% in MRUS TB ( P < 0.0001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Distribution of GS (6/7/8/9/10) was 46/101/35/14/2 in Likert scores 4 and 5 versus 2/4/2/1/0 in Likert score 3 (P < 0.001). MCCL was 8 mm (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) in Likert scores 4 and 5 versus 5 mm (2-15) in Likert score 3 (P < 0.05). The distribution of tumors detected, as well as GS differences in TB and SBx were evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations