2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-018-2246-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of restitution in rocking of single rigid blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the analytical solution of Equation ( 8) and the numerical one results in Figure 6: the elastic body continues to oscillate further as the bounding impact leads to a lower loss of energy. The difference in the response of the analytical and the numerical model is due to two factors: (i) the numerical model considers an elastic body, and (ii) the coefficient of restitution estimated by Housner [46] overestimates the energy loss due to bouncing [50][51][52].…”
Section: Rocking Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of the analytical solution of Equation ( 8) and the numerical one results in Figure 6: the elastic body continues to oscillate further as the bounding impact leads to a lower loss of energy. The difference in the response of the analytical and the numerical model is due to two factors: (i) the numerical model considers an elastic body, and (ii) the coefficient of restitution estimated by Housner [46] overestimates the energy loss due to bouncing [50][51][52].…”
Section: Rocking Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I cm is the mass moment of inertia of the rocking block about its center of gravity and k is a dimensionless parameter that was estimated as k = 0.72 using experiments of free-standing concrete members, with one of those members representing SRWs. 34 More recently, Equation (2) was adopted in Čeh et al 35 to investigate r in small-scale free-standing aluminum blocks. This research study confirmed experimentally that the SRM overestimates r in these blocks and proposed an approach for estimating k as a function of the block's size and slenderness ratio.…”
Section: Simple Rocking Model and Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Equation was adopted in Čeh et al to investigate r in small‐scale free‐standing aluminum blocks. This research study confirmed experimentally that the SRM overestimates r in these blocks and proposed an approach for estimating k as a function of the block's size and slenderness ratio.…”
Section: Simple Rocking Model and Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rocking oscillator has been used to describe the dynamic behavior of free-standing equipment [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], masonry structures [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and ancient temples [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Rocking is also a promising seismic response modification technique, both for bridges and buildings, with practical applications in the former USSR and New Zealand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%