2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.recote.2016.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of results of soft tissue sarcoma margins revision surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inexperienced practitioners may have an R2 rate of up to 13.5% [ 15 ]. However, after inappropriate surgery, imaging studies indicated the presence of residual disease in 53.1% of patients [ 19 ]. It is important to note that this study did not provide information on the radicality of the primary surgery.…”
Section: Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inexperienced practitioners may have an R2 rate of up to 13.5% [ 15 ]. However, after inappropriate surgery, imaging studies indicated the presence of residual disease in 53.1% of patients [ 19 ]. It is important to note that this study did not provide information on the radicality of the primary surgery.…”
Section: Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical role of achieving negative surgical margins to optimize local management of STS is widely recognized. Positive surgical margins predict local recurrence (LR) following STS excision [ 18 , 19 ]. Although not universally, numerous studies have also linked LR with a reduction in overall survival (OS) [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%