2017
DOI: 10.21125/edulearn.2017.1176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Robotics-Based Learning Interventions for Preventing School Failure and Early School Leaving in Gender Context

Abstract: Early school leaving (ESL) has become a problem plaguing many different countries around the world and several different solutions are being searched for. Gender, as a factor in early school leaving, has become a popular research topic among many researchers and has been displayed by recent OECD results that have shown that boys are dropping out of the education system more. Researchers are still debating whether or not the processes in school are inadequate for boys and so they're excluded out of the educatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not a new concept for education, although educational robotics (ER) is mostly associated with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in developing the understanding of mathematical concepts and principles of physics (Williams et al 2007), engineering (Ariza et al 2017;Zaldivar et al 2013), and other branches of STEM (Witherspoon et al 2018;Eck et al 2014) and in developing multiskills and knowledge in different levels of education from preschool to higher education. Lately, new research directions have been developed where it is proved that ER has such positive side effects as improved learning motivation (Daniela andStrods 2016, 2018;Daniela et al 2017;Alimisis 2014), improved interest in learning itself, possibilities of using ER with special needs students to involve them in active learning processes, overcoming the gender gap in STEM education, and other factors that can lead to risks of social marginalization and then to risks of early school leaving.…”
Section: Expanding Role Of Educational Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not a new concept for education, although educational robotics (ER) is mostly associated with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in developing the understanding of mathematical concepts and principles of physics (Williams et al 2007), engineering (Ariza et al 2017;Zaldivar et al 2013), and other branches of STEM (Witherspoon et al 2018;Eck et al 2014) and in developing multiskills and knowledge in different levels of education from preschool to higher education. Lately, new research directions have been developed where it is proved that ER has such positive side effects as improved learning motivation (Daniela andStrods 2016, 2018;Daniela et al 2017;Alimisis 2014), improved interest in learning itself, possibilities of using ER with special needs students to involve them in active learning processes, overcoming the gender gap in STEM education, and other factors that can lead to risks of social marginalization and then to risks of early school leaving.…”
Section: Expanding Role Of Educational Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the survey show that students wish to understand STEM subjects and they would like teachers to help resonate with the motivational development idea of the important role of self-efficacy [33,34] because it confirms that it is important for students with low learning achievements to feel they are succeeding, but this is not so important when students are already aware of the impact of their learning activities on learning achievements. The fact that this factor is significant for the group of high-achieving girls echoes the findings expressed by other researchers [35,36] regarding girls feeling more insecure about their academic achievements, so it is important for them to feel they are succeeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…πγθεθξηκέλα ε πεξηθέξεηα ηεο Θξάθεο είλαη ε κνλαδηθή φπνπ ην πνζνζηφ ΜΑ ζηα θνξίηζηα (22,5%) είλαη κεγαιχηεξν απφ ηα αγφξηα (21,5%) γηα ην 2013. Δ θαηάζηαζε απηή νθείιεηαη ζε πνιιαπινχο αίηηα φπσο θνηλσληθά, γεσγξαθηθά, πνιηηηζκηθά θαη πνιηηηθά, θαη εηδηθφηεξα ζηελ παξαδνζηαθή θνηλσληθή νξγάλσζε, ζηε γεσγξαθηθή απνκφλσζε, ζηνλ αγξνηηθφ ραξαθηήξα ηνπ κεηνλνηηθνχ πιεζπζκνχ θαη ησλ πεξηνξηζκψλ θαη απαγνξεχζεσλ γηα ηε γπλαίθα πνπ εθπνξεχνληαη απφ ηε κνπζνπικαληθή ζξεζθεία (Ώζθνχλε, 2006: 143-144, 246-250 (Daniela, Strods, & Alimisis, 2017). Ώπηφ επηηπγράλεηαη θαζψο δίλεη ηε δπλαηφηεηα ζχλζεζεο κία επέιηθηεο θαη ελδηαθέξνπζαο καζεζηαθήο δηαδηθαζίαο κέζσ ησλ λέσλ ηερλνινγηψλ θαη ηεο πξαθηηθήο εθαξκνγήο ηεο γλψζεο.…”
Section: έξεπλεο ζρεηηθά κε ηε μαζεηηθή γηαξξνή ζηελ διιάδαunclassified