2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-016-0577-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of satellite-induced factors affecting the accuracy of the BDS satellite differential code bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows that peak amplitudes vary from one millimeter to tens of millimeters for different BDS-2 satellites. Peak amplitudes for all IGSO satellites appear at 24 h, while those for all MEO satellites are close to 12 h. Different with IGSO and MEO satellites that have only one peak amplitude, two peak amplitudes for three GEO satellites can be found at 24 h and 12 h. The results are consistent with the orbital period of GEO, IGSO and MEO satellites (Shu et al 2017), which indicates that a second-order periodic function related to the sun-spacecraft-earth angle is suitable for modeling BDS-2 independent satellite PIFCB variations. In this study, the variations could be regarded as small enough to be ignored for the satellites whose peak amplitudes are much smaller than the noise of the GFIF combination of the carrier-phase observations.…”
Section: Model Implementation Using Bds-2 and Bds-3 Multi-frequency Datasupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Figure 2 shows that peak amplitudes vary from one millimeter to tens of millimeters for different BDS-2 satellites. Peak amplitudes for all IGSO satellites appear at 24 h, while those for all MEO satellites are close to 12 h. Different with IGSO and MEO satellites that have only one peak amplitude, two peak amplitudes for three GEO satellites can be found at 24 h and 12 h. The results are consistent with the orbital period of GEO, IGSO and MEO satellites (Shu et al 2017), which indicates that a second-order periodic function related to the sun-spacecraft-earth angle is suitable for modeling BDS-2 independent satellite PIFCB variations. In this study, the variations could be regarded as small enough to be ignored for the satellites whose peak amplitudes are much smaller than the noise of the GFIF combination of the carrier-phase observations.…”
Section: Model Implementation Using Bds-2 and Bds-3 Multi-frequency Datasupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The precise correction of SICB resulted in a significant improvement of larger than 75% for wide-lane uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) estimation and a minor improvement of less than 25% for narrow-lane UPD estimation with respect to the PPP ambiguity resolution [14]. The long-term stability of differential code bias (DCB) for BDS-2 MEO satellites was improved by 12-28% after the SICB was corrected [15]. In this contribution, the single-frequency PPP is also used to verify our proposed SICB correction model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason may be that the orbital period of BDS IGSO satellite is one day and that of BDS MEO satellite is seven days. Thus, some unmodeled error will decrease the accuracy of estimated MEO pseudorange bias [12,26].…”
Section: Bds Pseudorange Bias Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%