2016
DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.7.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of self-heating of thermally assisted spin-transfer torque magnetic random access memory

Abstract: Thermal assistance has been shown to significantly reduce the required operation power for spin torque transfer magnetic random access memory (STT-MRAM). Proposed heating methods include modified material stack compositions that result in increased self-heating or external heat sources. In this work we analyze the self-heating process of a standard perpendicular magnetic anisotropy STT-MRAM device through numerical simulations in order to understand the relative contributions of Joule, thermoelectric Peltier a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we assume an asymmetric heating parameter α = 0.9, i.e., 90% of the Joule heating is generated at the electron receiving eletrode, the temperature is always higher for the high voltage side of the junction. The temperature difference across tunnel barrier could reach tens of mK for current density of j e = 2 × 10 6 A cm −2 and voltage of 0.2 V. The actual temperature gradient across the barrier can be even larger when the stack structure and the passivation materials used in the MTJ device are optimized [38].…”
Section: Heat Transport and Temperature Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we assume an asymmetric heating parameter α = 0.9, i.e., 90% of the Joule heating is generated at the electron receiving eletrode, the temperature is always higher for the high voltage side of the junction. The temperature difference across tunnel barrier could reach tens of mK for current density of j e = 2 × 10 6 A cm −2 and voltage of 0.2 V. The actual temperature gradient across the barrier can be even larger when the stack structure and the passivation materials used in the MTJ device are optimized [38].…”
Section: Heat Transport and Temperature Profilementioning
confidence: 99%