Analysis of Service Quality Gap between Perceptions and Expectations of Service Recipients using SERVQUAL Approach in Selected Hospitals in Golestan Province

Abstract

Background and purpose: Services quality is an important factor of satisfaction, as well as a remarkable tool for marketing to achieve the competitive differentiation and promotion of customer's loyalty. The present study was aimed to analyze the quality gap using SERVQUAL approach at selected hospitals in Golestan Province at the year 2015. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 361 patients of selected hospitals of Golestan Province. To determine sample size, Cochran's sample size formula was utilized. Also, to collect the data, SERVQUAL questionnaire was used. The collected data was analyzed through SPSS Software (version 18), and running statistical tests including paired t-test and Pearson correlation. The level of significance was also considered to be ≤ 0.05. Results: The most expectation of hospital services quality was related to reliability dimension (31.60 ± 4.00), while the lowest perception was about responsiveness aspect (13.36 ± 5.74). The greatest gap between perceptions and expectances was in the reliability dimension (-4.54), which was significant (P<0.001). In terms of responsiveness dimension, there was a significant correlation between perceptions and expectances (r = 0.174, P≤0.001). Conclusions: The largest gap between perceptions and expectances was about reliability and tangibles dimensions that can likely be reduced by the staff appearance, physical environment, and utilization of suitable equipment and assurance to patients.

Lived experiences of management intern nursing students in the clinical settings of the quality of educational services using the SERVQUAL model: A descriptive phenomenology study

“…In agreement with our study, previous studies conducted in Iran demonstrated that it was a gap between the management intern nursing students' expectations of physical resources, the facilities and equipment of the ward and ideal conditions and also the students believed that creativity of the head of the ward was effective for managing the department due to the lack of both the personnel and the facilities, but they did not consider these conditions to be effective for the management intern nursing students' learning (Tehranineshat et al, 2022;Hoseini-Rostami et al, 2018).…”

Evaluating quality of contraceptive counseling using SERVQUAL model: A cross-sectional study in southern Ethiopia, 2021

“…Therefore, all Boloso Bombe public health institutions must pay particular attention to the quality of the counseling services provided and strive to provide quality counseling overall. This study was similar to the studies conducted in the different parts of the countries; 7 , 29 , 32 , 35 however, it contradicted the studies conducted in Poland 24 and Nigeria. 36 A possible explanation for this inconsistency could be inequality in facility structure, provider training and experience, and sociodemographic characteristics.…”

“…18,27,28,30,31 High quality of counseling service-The resulting SERVQUAL score is positive when performance exceeds expectation (P > E). 32 Satisfactory quality of counseling service-SERVQUAL score is zero (E = P) when perceived (performed) counseling service is equal to expected counseling service. 29 Low quality of counseling service-When SERVQUAL score is negative (E > P), then the performance does not meet the client's expectation.…”

Quality of health service in the local government authorities in Tanzania: a perspective of the healthcare seekers from Dodoma City and Bahi District councils

“…The public sector’s desire for quality service delivery emerges with the rise of people’s living standards, technology, and awareness that oblige policymakers and decision-makers to shift their focus toward quality services rather than larger quantities of low-quality services [ 6 ]. It is equally important to note that the quality of service is a matter of concern in the health sector since negligence in improving healthcare service may cause serious outcomes, including an increase in mortality rate, dissatisfaction with healthcare services, and the community members may reject to utilize the public healthcare services [ 4 , 7 ]. Thus, countries worldwide, both developing and developed countries, are striving jointly to build health systems to attain quality [ 2 ].…”