2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of shuffled gene libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical DNA shuffling was not feasible, as the identity between VEGF and VEGF-C is concentrated within the cystine knot; therefore, this method would have caused a strong crossover bias (30). A non-random approach resulted in a library size that allowed exhaustive profiling of the receptor binding pattern of each individual clone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical DNA shuffling was not feasible, as the identity between VEGF and VEGF-C is concentrated within the cystine knot; therefore, this method would have caused a strong crossover bias (30). A non-random approach resulted in a library size that allowed exhaustive profiling of the receptor binding pattern of each individual clone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Saraf and Maranas (14) proposed a rapid method to identify directly such clashes between contacting residue pairs in the protein hybrids. Comparison with sequence data of functional clones derived from many studies (4,11,(15)(16)(17) revealed that the method was capable of classifying hybrids (crossover combinations) as functional or nonfunctional accounting for mirror chimeras. However, neither this method nor any of those discussed earlier manage to a priori rank functional hybrids with respect to their level of activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of family gene shuffling strategy has been demonstrated by the previous reports (Crameri et al 1998;Niederhauser et al 2012;Madan and Mishra 2014). It was indicated that the gene sequence homology of parent template should be more than 70% for gene shuffling in order to achieve the favorable result (Joern et al 2002). Although the sequence homology of four protease genes in this study was only 42%, the good result was achieved by increasing PCR cycles from 15 to 40 without primers, indicating that the higher homology was not essential for DNA shuffling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%