1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-0102(84)80002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of signal content of Purkinje cell responses to optokinetic stimuli in the rabbit cerebellar flocculus by selective lesions of brainstem pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recorded the extracellular unit activity from a PN in the H zone of flocculus during OKR. The firing rate of SS was increased during ipsilaterally directed (toward the PN recording side) screen movement and decreased during contralaterally directed movement in both WT and δ2–/–, whereas that of CS was modulated in the reciprocal manner as reported previously in mice and other animal species (Figs 2 and 3) (Miyashita & Nagao, 1984; Graf et al ., 1988; Stone & Lisberger, 1990; Goossens et al ., 2004). SS firing rate was approximately in phase with the ipsilaterally directed screen velocity (i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We recorded the extracellular unit activity from a PN in the H zone of flocculus during OKR. The firing rate of SS was increased during ipsilaterally directed (toward the PN recording side) screen movement and decreased during contralaterally directed movement in both WT and δ2–/–, whereas that of CS was modulated in the reciprocal manner as reported previously in mice and other animal species (Figs 2 and 3) (Miyashita & Nagao, 1984; Graf et al ., 1988; Stone & Lisberger, 1990; Goossens et al ., 2004). SS firing rate was approximately in phase with the ipsilaterally directed screen velocity (i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Barmack & Simpson (1980) have found, in rabbits, that after lesion of the dorsal cap of the inferior olive low-velocity optokinetic responses were impaired. However, interruption of the visual pathway to the inferior olive of the rabbit has been reported to lead to no change in gain or phase of optokinetic responses induced by a slowly moving slit light (Miyashita & Nagao, 1984). On the other hand, in the cat, no changes in the optokinetic responses were observed after dorsal cap lesion (Haddad et al 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These studies have indicated that following lesion or inactivation of the inferior olive, there is an impairment in precise performance of movements, in motor reflex activity and in postural tone. Similar lesion or inactivation experiments have been performed to study the effects of climbing fibre deafferentation on oculomotor behaviour in the rabbit (Ito & Miyashita, 1975;Barmack & Simpson, 1980;Miyashita & Nagao, 1984) and in the cat (Haddad, Demer & Robinson, 1980;Demer & Robinson, 1982). Most of these studies are 350 EYE MOVEMENTS AND INFERIOR OLIVE LESION dealing with the role of visual climbing fibre activity for visual modification of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inputs from the NRTP to the FL may mediate optokinetic signals during horizontal optokinetic eye movement responses (OKR) in the afoveated animals. Lesion of the NRTP or FL markedly depresses the horizontal OKR gain in rabbits (Nagao, 1983;Miyashita and Nagao, 1984). Neurons in the NRTP exhibit responses to the optokinetic stimulation in rabbits (Kano et al, 1991) and monkeys (Crandall and Keller, 1985).…”
Section: Nucleus Reticularis Tegmenti Pontismentioning
confidence: 99%