2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Skin Flap Thickness and Residual Breast Tissue After Mastectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent issue of the Red Journal, Giannotti et al report the results of an elegant analysis using magnetic resonance imaging to better quantify the variation in skin flap thickness in 501 postmastectomy breasts (in 367 women; mostly with breast cancer, but also including some undergoing elective/prophylactic surgery) (14). They demonstrate that skin flap thickness varies by location (thinner in the central [mean z 6-10 mm] vs peripheral [mean z 14-24 mm] regions of the breast), and there is much interpatient variation (eg, standard deviations range from z 6-14 mm for the different regions; personal communication with the authors, July 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent issue of the Red Journal, Giannotti et al report the results of an elegant analysis using magnetic resonance imaging to better quantify the variation in skin flap thickness in 501 postmastectomy breasts (in 367 women; mostly with breast cancer, but also including some undergoing elective/prophylactic surgery) (14). They demonstrate that skin flap thickness varies by location (thinner in the central [mean z 6-10 mm] vs peripheral [mean z 14-24 mm] regions of the breast), and there is much interpatient variation (eg, standard deviations range from z 6-14 mm for the different regions; personal communication with the authors, July 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the breast, the skin flap was thicker on the periphery than in the central regions. They did not find any significant difference in tumor recurrence in relation to the presence of residual breast tissue and flap thickness (42). Wiberg also demonstrated differences in skin flap thickness between the different breast quadrants, by analyzing 45 women who had undergone prophylactic mastectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The presence of residual breast tissue in the NAC is not surprising in this study. Presence of RBT after open NSM is not uncommon and is most common in tissue behind the NAC [ 23 , 24 ]. In a study using MRI to evaluate for RBT after mastectomy, the overall frequency of RBT was 77.8% and when the NAC region was excluded, the frequency of RBT was 51.6% in NSMs [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon may be due to lack of Cooper’s ligaments under the NAC, leading to more difficult precise dissection in the dermis-fibroglandular tissue junction [ 25 ]. More importantly, the incidence of local recurrence after open NSM is low despite the presence of RBT [ 2 , [26] , [27] , [28] ]. Nipple areolar complex recurrence after open NSM ranges from 0 to 7% in most recent series [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%