2016
DOI: 10.1080/00288233.2016.1209529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of soil eDNA functional genes: potential to increase profitability and sustainability of pastoral agriculture

Abstract: Management of soil biological resources to optimise plant production, efficiency of nutrient inputs, and system sustainability is an emerging opportunity for pastoral agriculture. To achieve these goals, suitable tools that can assess the functional state of the soil ecosystem must be developed and standardised approaches to their application adopted. Towards this end, we have undertaken comprehensive, high-density functional-gene microarray analysis (GeoChip5) of environmental DNA (eDNA) extracted from 50 pas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gene categories defined above were used collectively (All Genes) and individually to assess the influence of soil properties on functional gene composition among soils (general analysis approach described in [ 39 ]). To compare the abundance of individual genes among soil samples, signal intensities were first standardized by the number of probes per gene (to account for disproportionate numbers of probes) and expressed as per gram of soil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gene categories defined above were used collectively (All Genes) and individually to assess the influence of soil properties on functional gene composition among soils (general analysis approach described in [ 39 ]). To compare the abundance of individual genes among soil samples, signal intensities were first standardized by the number of probes per gene (to account for disproportionate numbers of probes) and expressed as per gram of soil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These host × microbiome × environment relationships in agricultural production systems involve extremely broad and complex interactions along the soil-plant and animal continuum, and its investigation needs to be divided into more specific research questions to enable detailed dissection and analysis. In this context, an “ecological genomics” approach is appropriate, whereby the microbiomes associated with soil, plants and animals are recognized as an integral part of an interconnected system that influence the functions of their hosts and thereby contribute significantly to productive processes in the pastoral sector (71). The key features of, and interactions between the soil-plant-animal microbiomes need to be identified so that their contributions to these agricultural processes and their impacts on the environment can be quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of association between organic S and the soil ecosystem function was unexpected, as this has rarely been reported, although the organic S status of soils is rarely measured as part of soil microbial ecology studies (Wakelin et al 2008). In studies where various sulphur forms are measured, such as a survey of 50 New Zealand pasture soils, associations between bacterial abundance (Dignam et al 2018) and function (Wakelin et al 2016) have been evident. These findings indicate that sulphur may have a regulatory influence on the biogeochemical processes underpinning a range soil functions (including C, N and P cycling) and should be routinely measured in soil microbial ecology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sample collected from under native bush at Eyrewell, there was insufficient DNA to conduct GeoChip analysis. Although whole community genome amplification could be used to increase total DNA content (Wang et al 2011), the bias associated with this method can be large and obfuscate underlying biological trends (Wakelin et al 2016). As such, this sample was not included for processing or subsequent data analysis.…”
Section: Soil Functional Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%