1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Stiffness in the Immersed Boundary Method and Implications for Time-Stepping Schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The leading order term we derive above is calculated analytically using the spacecontinuous formulation with an unsmoothed Dirac delta function. As Stockie and Wetton pointed out in [32], this analysis over-predicts the stiffness of the Immersed Boundary method in a practical computation. If we use the leading order approximation directly, the semi-implicit scheme with the leading order terms derived above tends to over-dissipate the solution.…”
Section: The Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The leading order term we derive above is calculated analytically using the spacecontinuous formulation with an unsmoothed Dirac delta function. As Stockie and Wetton pointed out in [32], this analysis over-predicts the stiffness of the Immersed Boundary method in a practical computation. If we use the leading order approximation directly, the semi-implicit scheme with the leading order terms derived above tends to over-dissipate the solution.…”
Section: The Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 86%
“…One of the main difficulties that the Immersed Boundary method encounters is that it suffers from a severe timestep restriction in order to keep the stability [27,32,30]. This has been the major limitation of the Immersed Boundary method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most commonly used schemes with an explicit treatment of the immersed boundary is the so-called Forward Euler/Backward Euler (FE/BE) [3] in which the tension force is explicit (Forward Euler) and the viscous term is implicit (Backward Euler). That is,…”
Section: Some Comments On Computational Costs and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large number of applications, the immersed boundaries or structures are very stiff and strong tangential forces on these interfaces induce severe time-step restrictions for explicit discretization [2,3]. Fully implicit discretizations and some suitable semi-implicit schemes remove this hindering constraint but seemingly at a cost that makes these options impractical [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known, the IB method suffers a time step restriction to maintain numerical stability [21,27,29,30]. This restriction becomes more stringent when the elastic force is stiff and the force spreading occurs at the beginning of each time step (an explicit scheme).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%