2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0781-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of stress-only imaging, comparing upright and supine CZT camera acquisition to conventional gamma camera images with and without attenuation correction, with coronary angiography as a reference

Abstract: Stress-only upright and supine CZT imaging was non-inferior statistically to attenuation-corrected stress-only Anger camera imaging. Nevertheless, stress-only CZT imaging may be associated with reduced diagnostic sensitivity for some readers compared to attenuation-corrected Anger camera images, which may be less acceptable clinically compared to stress plus rest images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12] Accordingly, the scholarly literature on CZT MPI is continuing to expand momentously, as demonstrated by the work by Jameria and colleagues published in this issue of the Journal. 13 Specifically, Jameria et al report hereby a singlecenter retrospective observational study comparing acquisition of MPI with CZT vs Anger cameras, and focusing on several protocol subtleties such as stressonly vs stress-rest acquisition, and upright vs supine positioning, while using a D-SPECT suite and relying on coronary angiography as gold standard. 13 Notably, a total of 740 subjects underwent MPI with both D-SPECT and Anger cameras, even if only 112 (15.1%) patients had coronary angiographic details, with 48 (6.5%) of them eventually showing significant CAD at angiography.…”
Section: See Related Article Pp 540-549mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[10][11][12] Accordingly, the scholarly literature on CZT MPI is continuing to expand momentously, as demonstrated by the work by Jameria and colleagues published in this issue of the Journal. 13 Specifically, Jameria et al report hereby a singlecenter retrospective observational study comparing acquisition of MPI with CZT vs Anger cameras, and focusing on several protocol subtleties such as stressonly vs stress-rest acquisition, and upright vs supine positioning, while using a D-SPECT suite and relying on coronary angiography as gold standard. 13 Notably, a total of 740 subjects underwent MPI with both D-SPECT and Anger cameras, even if only 112 (15.1%) patients had coronary angiographic details, with 48 (6.5%) of them eventually showing significant CAD at angiography.…”
Section: See Related Article Pp 540-549mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Specifically, Jameria et al report hereby a singlecenter retrospective observational study comparing acquisition of MPI with CZT vs Anger cameras, and focusing on several protocol subtleties such as stressonly vs stress-rest acquisition, and upright vs supine positioning, while using a D-SPECT suite and relying on coronary angiography as gold standard. 13 Notably, a total of 740 subjects underwent MPI with both D-SPECT and Anger cameras, even if only 112 (15.1%) patients had coronary angiographic details, with 48 (6.5%) of them eventually showing significant CAD at angiography. In this series, moderate defects were predominant, and all images were interpreted independently by two different nuclear physicians, with varying experience.…”
Section: See Related Article Pp 540-549mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regardless of the attenuation-compensation method used, reducing the uncertainly of attenuation in clinical images improved the confidence of the clinician in the images and is of particular importance when stress-only protocols are used because, by eliminating attenuation artifacts, they reduce the need for resting images. 36,39,45,46 Equipment for Attenuation Correction Application of attenuation correction requires a patient-specific map of the attenuating media, the attenuation map. The most practical way of measuring the attenuation map is through a transmission scan, either made with a radionuclide sealed source or through CT.…”
Section: Attenuation Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%