“…13 Specifically, Jameria et al report hereby a singlecenter retrospective observational study comparing acquisition of MPI with CZT vs Anger cameras, and focusing on several protocol subtleties such as stressonly vs stress-rest acquisition, and upright vs supine positioning, while using a D-SPECT suite and relying on coronary angiography as gold standard. 13 Notably, a total of 740 subjects underwent MPI with both D-SPECT and Anger cameras, even if only 112 (15.1%) patients had coronary angiographic details, with 48 (6.5%) of them eventually showing significant CAD at angiography. In this series, moderate defects were predominant, and all images were interpreted independently by two different nuclear physicians, with varying experience.…”