2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Subjective and Objective Screening Techniques as Predictors of Safety for Radial Artery Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with palmar arch instability present a major incidence for vessel occlusion, and TRA is not indicated in this group category. For this reason, the subjective Allen's test and objective tests like Barbeau test or Princeps Pollicis artery ultrasound are recommended for every patient before the procedure in order to evaluate the hand collateral patency [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with palmar arch instability present a major incidence for vessel occlusion, and TRA is not indicated in this group category. For this reason, the subjective Allen's test and objective tests like Barbeau test or Princeps Pollicis artery ultrasound are recommended for every patient before the procedure in order to evaluate the hand collateral patency [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, given that the change of several catheters during coronary angiography has been related to the presence of radial artery spasm, we also recognize the absence of this variable in the initial protocol as a limitation. Together with this limitation, ultrasound evaluation of the palmar arch at rest or with occlusion maneuvers was not performed due to the lack of a high-frequency transducer such as the GE L8-18i hockey stick used in other studies, 33 which limited the collection of potential variables for the diagnosis of repercussion in patients with artery occlusion. In addition, we recognize that there may be patient selection biases, since those with low-intensity radial pulse were usually excluded from radial access and coronary angiography was performed via the femoral route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adicionalmente, dado que se ha relacionado el cambio de varios catéteres durante la coronariografía con la presencia de espasmo de la arteria radial, también reconocemos como limitación la ausencia de esta variable en el protocolo inicial. Conjuntamente a esta limitación, no se realizó evaluación ecográfica del arco palmar en reposo o con maniobras de oclusión por no contar con un transductor de alta frecuencia como el GE L8-18i en palo de hockey usado en otros estudios 33 , lo cual limitó la recolección de variables potenciales para el diagnóstico de repercusión en los pacientes con oclusión de la arteria. Además, reconocemos que puede haber sesgos de selección de pacientes, dado que aquellos con un pulso radial de baja intensidad solían ser excluidos del acceso radial y la coronariografía se realizaba vía femoral.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified