2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of surface roughness and cutting force components in hard turning with CBN tool: Prediction model and cutting conditions optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
145
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
12
145
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure includes following six steps (Aouici et al, 2012). These are, (1) definition of independent input variables and the desired output responses, (2) adoption of an experimental design plan, (3) performing regression analysis with the quadratic model of RSM, (4) calculate analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the independent input variables in order to find significant parameters that affect the responses, (5) determination of the situation of the quadratic model of Response Surface Methodology and decide whether the model of RSM needs screening variables or not and finally, (6) optimization, conduction of confirmation experiments and verifying the predicted performance characteristics.…”
Section: Experimental Design 221 Response Surface Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This procedure includes following six steps (Aouici et al, 2012). These are, (1) definition of independent input variables and the desired output responses, (2) adoption of an experimental design plan, (3) performing regression analysis with the quadratic model of RSM, (4) calculate analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the independent input variables in order to find significant parameters that affect the responses, (5) determination of the situation of the quadratic model of Response Surface Methodology and decide whether the model of RSM needs screening variables or not and finally, (6) optimization, conduction of confirmation experiments and verifying the predicted performance characteristics.…”
Section: Experimental Design 221 Response Surface Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it was reported that workpiece hardness, cutting edge geometry and cutting speed significantly influenced the force component. Aouici et al, (2012) studied the effects of cutting speed; feed rate, depth of cut and work-piece hardness on surface roughness and force components in hard turning of AISI H11 steel using CBN tools. Mathematical models and analysis of results were performed using RSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.6 times better than uncoated CC650 ceramic tool whereas uncoated ceramic tool was helpful for decreasing the machining force. Aouici et al [13] examined the influence of cutting speed, feed and work material hardness along with depth of cut on surface quality along with cutting force in turning of hardened AISI H11 grade steel using CBN cutting tools through RSM approach and developed mathematical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verma et al [17] also derived through Taguchi method optimal cutting condition to obtain appreciably low surface roughness in turning ASTM A242 Type-1 alloy steel. The effect of cutting parameters and workpiece hardness on surface roughness and cutting force components in hard turning of AISI H11 steel was investigated by Aouici et al [18] using cubic boron nitride. Yadav et al [19] evaluated the relation between the change in hardness of EN 8 workpiece during turning with varying machining parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%