2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of tax incentives for energy-efficient durables in the EU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the findings of other studies, under the so-called "energy efficiency paradox". Similar behaviour has even been observed among individual consumers when they choose the energy efficiency level of their domestic appliances (Markandya et al, 2009). From a public policy viewpoint it seems advisable, therefore, to focus on this issue through policies to support reductions in investment costs (subsidies for investments, tax deductions, cheaper loans, etc) as opposed to longer term policies that focus on increasing the benefits from investment (increases in energy prices or carbon pricing, for example).…”
Section: Specification 4: With Cost and Benefitmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This result is consistent with the findings of other studies, under the so-called "energy efficiency paradox". Similar behaviour has even been observed among individual consumers when they choose the energy efficiency level of their domestic appliances (Markandya et al, 2009). From a public policy viewpoint it seems advisable, therefore, to focus on this issue through policies to support reductions in investment costs (subsidies for investments, tax deductions, cheaper loans, etc) as opposed to longer term policies that focus on increasing the benefits from investment (increases in energy prices or carbon pricing, for example).…”
Section: Specification 4: With Cost and Benefitmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Train and Atherton (1995) find that attractive loans with low interest rates or long repayment periods are necessary to have the same effect as rebates and that offering customers the option of loans or rebates are more effective than programmes offering only loans or rebates. Markandya et al (2009) find that subsidies are, in general, less cost-effective than an energy tax. They conclude that, depending on a particularly country and policy options, it can be cost-effective to promote the use of energy-efficient appliances by using incentives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, one must evaluate the energy saving effects during the use of electrical appliances as well as consider the environmental effects spanning the lifecycle of the product from the time of manufacturing to disposal. With regard to promoting the spread of energy-efficient durables, Markandya et al (2009) have compared the cost-efficiency between levying an energy tax and imposing a subsidy on durables, and found that it differs for each type of durable. Gaspar and Antunes (2011) note that as consumers' purchasing behavior of electrical appliances and energy efficiency are diverse, it is necessary to come up with the ideal eco-label that appeals to every type of consumer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%