2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: A preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After en-masse retraction, short-term fixed appliances or clear aligners can be used as the finishing stage. 5 The technique described in this study is the result from several years of experience and observation of the clinical application of temporary skeletal anchorage devices. Further studies are needed to determine the treatment effects of enmasse retraction with different type of skeletal anchorage based on retraction force, length of hook, and bracket slot size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After en-masse retraction, short-term fixed appliances or clear aligners can be used as the finishing stage. 5 The technique described in this study is the result from several years of experience and observation of the clinical application of temporary skeletal anchorage devices. Further studies are needed to determine the treatment effects of enmasse retraction with different type of skeletal anchorage based on retraction force, length of hook, and bracket slot size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fter Kanomi's report 1 on this concept, published case reports with mini-implants when applying conventional orthodontic mechanics have shown new complications, such as anterior bite deepening, occlusal plane canting, and posterior open bite or posterior crossbite. [2][3][4][5] When using mini-implants to retract the anterior teeth, it is most important to consider the location of the center of resistance (CR) relative to the location of the mini-implants. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Successful bodily translation of the anterior teeth might require additional complicated archwires or a supplementary mini-implant in the anterior segment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19][20][21] Biocreative therapy was developed to enable retraction without involving the posterior segments and thus avoid such side effects. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The C-implant supports some osseointegration and accomplishes controlled anterior retraction with a ,1 mm change in the posterior unbracketed segments. Normal home care is possible for these patients since the posterior teeth are free of appliances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Segmental orthodontics can be a good choice for this, 4,5 and biocreative therapy for anterior retraction offers a further advantage since fixed posterior appliances are not necessary. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Orthodontists often choose to remove premolars to retract crowded or protrusive anterior teeth. Location and management of the center of resistance with respect to retraction force vectors (Cres) is critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%